Talk:Mega Man Battle Network 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
 |
A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department) | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
How come my paragraph regarding the fact that this is the first game you can earn stars on the title screen and how they are earned keeps getting deleted?76.177.174.82 09:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Because Wikipedia is not GameFAQs. You may note that this is the first game to include the stars, and an explanation that the stars serve to indicate progress in the game, in fact I encourage you to, but saying how to get them constitutes gameguide information which we try to keep out of this encyclopedia. --Niroht 02:43, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was PAGES MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 02:36, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Requested move
MegaMan Battle Network 2 → Mega Man Battle Network 2 — Capcom spells it as 2 words instead of 1 word in CamelCase [1]. I'm also suggesting all the other MMBN articles be moved as well, I would except somebody already made them redirects TJ Spyke 00:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
- Support of coarse. TJ Spyke 07:26, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support it is the proper name and all the games in the other Mega Man series have a space for Mega Man. There is no reason not to have one here. --69.156.204.183 02:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Official names have the space. --- RockMFR 03:22, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support, the CamelCase varriant appears to be a layout eccentricity. - Cyrus XIII 22:31, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Megaman box.jpg
Image:Megaman box.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
