Talk:Mega Man Anniversary Collection
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Sales
Mega Man Anniversary Collection did not sell well, especially on the Nintendo GameCube because newer or mainstream gamers reject direct ports of ancient video games on modern consoles. They are typically find it difficult to grasp at long-dated graphics on modern consoles. I am personally opposed to direct ports of ancient video games on modern home television game consoles. Tedius Zanarukando 21 Mar 2005 22:53 (EST)
- Dude, that sounds more like POV if you ask me. I mean, why would gamers NOT want collections of older games on modern consoles? - Nintendo Maximus
It DID sell well, the up-coming release of the Mega Man X Collection being a direct result of it. I'm just pissed they didn't bring it to Europe.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.248.118.81 (talk • contribs) 21:29, October 16, 2005.
Especially on GameCube? That's pure BS right there, since the GC version earned the Player's Choice lable. And the release of MMXC on BOTH the PS2 and GC is more proof this collection sold well on BOTH systems.-Mega Man 5 December 18, 2006
I like older games on newer consoles. You get to experience classic games on a console that most people have. I mean, you can't find a SNES in stores, you know. - Tenguman
[edit] Neutrality
The section "Controversy and differences" is a pov issue. The name is implying that any difference is a controversy. There are also a total lack of sources in that part of the article. If none are forthcoming, I'll rename the section and reformat it to comply with WP:NPOV and WP:OR.--Crossmr 03:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Why is emulation for these companies so difficult?
It's ridiculous, seeing as how people on the internet do it all the time. There was supposed to be a GBA port but I don't remember it ever coming out.209.91.61.251 23:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rewrite.
Looking at this article, I think a complete rewrite is in order. There are all sorts of presentation errors throughout the article, such as unnecessary Bold Text. Numerous points about the compilations are missing completely, and there aren't enough cites, as the warning suggests.
I'm going to see what I can do between other projects, and, to anyone interested, help would be appreciated. As a huge Mega Man fan, I think this article deserves more attention. - EliotAndrews (talk) 05:34, 18 December 2007 (UTC)