Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-03-06 User:CanucksRule

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia Mediation Cabal
Article: User:CanucksRule
State: Closed

Requested By: Canadianshoper
Other Parties: Canadianshoper User:CanucksRuleUser:Re-evolution
Mediated By: Snowolf
Comments: One user was simply vandalising a user page. Advised to revert and warn


Contents

[edit] Mediation Case: 2007-03-06 User:CanucksRule

Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.


[edit] Request Information

Request made by: Canadianshoper 01:47, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Where is the issue taking place?
...On User: CanucksRule
Who's involved?
...Me, User:Re-evolution
What's going on?
...Re-evolution is harming the userpage by adding things that the user would not want, like vandalism. (Saying that CanucksRule likes to lick the ground, adding that his email is dumbass@dumbass.com ect.
What would you like to change about that?
...To stop him and change things back without having an edit war
Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
...No need to keep it private, user talk will be fine

[edit] Mediator response

There is no need for mediation here. Re-evolution is simply a vandal who is vandalising other user's pages. Simply revert his vandalism but always warn him by using the appropriate templates. After the forth warning, you can submit him/her here so he/she can be blocked. Snowolf(talk)CONCOI - 02:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Case closed. Snowolf(talk)CONCOI - 02:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Compromise offers

This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.

[edit] Discussion

While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.