Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-02-03 Goa inquisition

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia Mediation Cabal
Article: Goa Inquisition
State: Closed

Requested By: User:Xandar
Other Parties: User:Xandar, User:Rumpelstiltskin223, others to be named
Mediated By: User:Hipocrite
Comments: Rumpelstiltskin223 indefed as sock of indefed user.


Contents

[edit] Mediation Case: 2007-02-03 Goa inquisition

Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.


[edit] Request Information

Request made by: Xandar 12:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Where is the issue taking place?
...Goa Inquisition and talk page
Who's involved?
...Myself Rumpleskiltskin and others
What's going on?
...Rumpleskiltskin keeps putting specific inflammatory and extreme allegations about the Goa Inquisition back into the article despite being unable to provide authoritative references for the accusations. the article is also very POV and opinionated.
What would you like to change about that?
... The article needs extreme allegations removed (thousands killed, jews massacred, Hindus burned in batches etc) It also needs POV and loose language implying massacres to be cleaned up. Rumplestiltskin seems disinclined to agree that his view of the Inquisition in Goa may be wrong.
Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
...

[edit] Mediator response

Would all of the parties agree to mediation? Asking on the talk page. Hipocrite - «Talk» 13:48, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Closed - User:Rumpelstiltskin223 is an indefblockedsock of User:Hkelkar. Hipocrite - «Talk» 14:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Compromise offers

This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.

[edit] Discussion

While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.