Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-11-09 Kbdank71
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Wikipedia Mediation Cabal | ||||||||||||
|
Contents |
[edit] Mediation Case: 2006-11-09 Kbdank71
Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.
[edit] Request Information
- Request made by: Espoo 00:08, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Where is the issue taking place?
- User talk:Kbdank71#Category:Finland-Swedish
- What's going on?
- I feel that this admin is disregarding and acting in violation of some of WP's most important policies
- What would you like to change about that?
- Get somebody to explain to both of us how WP is supposed to work in such a case.
- Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
- Yes, by email. I'd first like some advice because i feel that this admin treats me condescendingly and by skipping essential parts of my responses. Thanks for any help! Right now i'm very frustrated and have the feeling that a disruptive user has as much weight as all experts in a field and that this kind of disruptive behavior is condoned by this admin who doesn't bother to do more than superficially skim a detailed explanation of expert opinion and relevant WP policies.
[edit] Mediator response
[edit] Compromise offers
This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.
[edit] Discussion
While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.
