Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-10-23 UNC Carolina nicknames and links

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia Mediation Cabal
Article: UNC-Duke rivalry & Related
State: Closed

Requested By: DukeEgr93 (talk · contribs)
Other Parties: Dubc0724 (talk · contribs), Remember (talk · contribs), Duke53 (talk · contribs)
Mediated By: Bottesini


Contents

[edit] Mediation Case: 2006-10-23 UNC Carolina nicknames and links

Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.


[edit] Request Information

Request made by: DukeEGR93 13:57, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Where is the issue taking place?
Carowhina, Dook, University of New Jersey at Durham, UNC-Duke rivalry
Who's involved?
User:DukeEgr93
User:Dubc0724
User:Remember
User:Duke53
What's going on?
As with any great rivalry, there are different ways said rivalry can be maintained. Some of them are less encyclopedica than others, including attack pages and incendiary links containing disparaging nicknames on otherwise encyclopedic pages.
What would you like to change about that?
All those attack pages and incendiary links should be avoided, or agreement should be reached as to their appropriateness on WP.
Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
Out in the open would be better, actually.

[edit] Mediator response

Case is open; beginning review. -- ßottesiηi (talk) 16:58, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Compromise had been reached prior to opening case (Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Dook). Case closed. -- ßottesiηi (talk) 17:23, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Compromise offers

This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.

[edit] Discussion

While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.

You may not need to review this as we already came up with a compromise here [1]. At least that was my understanding. Remember 17:17, 3 November 2006 (UTC)