Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-09-20 Animal rights
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Mediation Cabal | |
| 2006-09-20 Animal rights | |
| Article | Animal rights |
|---|---|
| Status | Closed |
| Requestor | Harisingh |
| Parties | SlimVirgin |
| Mediator(s) | Xyrael |
| Comment | Closed due to declination from an involved party. |
Contents |
[edit] Mediation Case: Animal rights
Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.
[edit] Request Information
- Request made by: Hari Singh 06:30, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Where is the issue taking place?
- I am trying to add a section on history from India and the view about animal rights from Sikhism but these are being reverted. I have discussed this at length on the discussion page but the agenda seems to be predetermined by a selected few dealing with this article. It appears that animal rights has become a "set topic" in western educational institutes and the issue covered have been restricted.
- Who's involved?
- user:slimvirgin
- What's going on?
- she does not accept that these views although found elsewhere can go here
- What would you like to change about that?
- I feel that any relevant views regarding this issue should be allowed as per WP policy
- Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
- not too concerned but I will leave it to you. My email if you need it is: - asikh@msn.com
[edit] Mediator response
I'm not totally sure that this issue is appropriate for mediation, because negotiation on the page in question is still going ahead. I would like to suggest that mediation be left as an option if negotiation fails, as so far it is civil and seems to be making progress. In that voice I would propose closing this mediation, and leaving opening a new one as an option. However, if this is not appropriate in your opinion I would be happy to go ahead. Thanks. —Xyrael / 16:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- I would not be willing to enter into mediation about this, as it's a fairly straightforward case of an editor trying to add original research, and other editors will be able to confirm that to the user in question. SlimVirgin (talk) 03:54, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- Personally, I don't think there is a lot of point in continuing with a mediation where one of the primary involved parties is not willing to continue. For this reason, I am closing the mediation for the time being. Thank you. —Xyrael / 20:09, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Compromise offers
This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.
[edit] Discussion
While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.
