Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-07-25 CSICOP

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia Mediation Cabal
Article: Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal
State: Closed

Requested By: Davkal (talk · contribs)
Other Parties: Primarily Davkal (talk · contribs) and KarlBunker (talk · contribs)
Mediated By: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)
Comments: no activity for two months


Contents

[edit] Mediation Case: 2006-07-25 CSICOP

Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.


[edit] Request Information

Request made by: Davkal 10:35, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Where is the issue taking place?
CSICOP article Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal --Ideogram 05:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Who's involved?
Myself and primarily Karl Bunker
What's going on?
Several poepl (including Karl) have complained about POV - I am trying to respond to their complaint but Karl is simply reverting every change I make and contributing nothing more - nor will he debate anything on the talk page
What would you like to change about that?
I want to improve the article but feel that this cannot be done at present.
Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
NO, just use talk page on CSICOP

[edit] Mediator response

Clerk notes - this is a re-request from Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-06-25 CSICOP. CQJ 14:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Discussion ongoing at the talk page. Mike Christie 16:29, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Requestor has left. Closing case. --Ideogram 07:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Compromise offers

This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.

[edit] Discussion

While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.