Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-05-11 Benson, Vermont

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Mediation Case: 2006-05-11 Benson, Vermont

Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.


[edit] Request Information

Request made by: Jessamyn (talk) 01:46, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Where is the issue taking place?
on the Benson, Vermont page,
Who's involved?
User:Tellywall, User:Bensonite, User:Babybazzer, User:Jessamyn, User:H0n0r
What's going on?
the first three users listed above (may be the same person, unclear) are adding unsourced/uncited people to the notable people list, we have reverted these insertions with commentary and then we're being insulted and derided on the talk page. example: "I am going to keep putting these people back in as long as you keep taking them out" We haven't been sujper speedy on the reverts, so it's not a 3RR situation yet, but I'd like to try to calm it down before it gets to that place. All we'd like them to do is include cites in keeping with policy.
What would you like to change about that?
I fear this is going to become an edit war and I'd like either some advice on next steps, some assistance talking policy with these folks, or, if worse comes to worse, some protection for the Benson, Vermont page.
If you'd prefer we work discreetly, how can we reach you?
I can be emailed via my userpage.
Would you be willing to be a mediator yourself, and accept a mediation assignment in a different case?
This is, following the Categorical Imperative, the idea that you might want to do
what you expect others to do. You don't have to, of course, that's why it's a question.
sure, thank you

[edit] Mediator response

If you do a contrib check on the 3 users mentioned

They only have gone after this one article. They are pretty clearly sock puppets. This seems like trolling/vandalism something for admin rather than mediation cabal. Recommending this get reported to admin for ban/block.

Closing case

[edit] Evidence

Please report evidence in this section with {{Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Evidence}} for misconduct and {{Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Evidence3RR}} for 3RR violations. If you need help ask a mediator or an advocate. Evidence is of limited use in mediation as the mediator has no authority. Providing some evidence may, however, be useful in making both sides act more civil.
Wikipedia:Etiquette: Although it's understandably difficult in a heated argument, if the other party is not as civil as you'd like them to be, make sure to be more civil than him or her, not less.

[edit] Compromise offers

This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.


[edit] Comments by others

While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.


[edit] Discussion