Talk:Media imperialism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Tabloids are lumped with legitimate news sources, that are accused of ignoring and perverting events without any proof thereof. -Julius
This page helped me very much Thanks -- Anon reader
- You're welcome. -- Derek Ross
The content of this page is ironic as it states ideas/opinions as fact while at the same time saying accuracy and fairness of information that is provided is being compromised. The page states as if it were fact that freedom of information remains slim instead of offering something along the lines of critics argue that freedom of information is slim. It also condones censorship without giving any positives, thus resulting in a bias. --anonymous
[edit] bias tag
I've added a bias tag to this article. The concept of media imperialism is a complicated and controversial one, which is not properly reflected in this article. I do appreciate the inclusion of references to prominent theorists in the field, but the article is wanting both of a dispassionate breakdown of the theory as well as from lacking a neutral point of view. It could be that most people reading this article tend to agree on a pernicious consequence of growing 'multinational media conglomerates', but the article should approach the subject from a neutral point of view. As is, readers are immediately given a biased impression of the subject. I'm hoping to contribute to the article this weekend to improve things. Cuffeparade (talk) 09:58, 9 May 2008 (UTC)