Talk:MediaDefender
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Archives |
[edit] Revision3
I think in light of Jim Louderback's claim of MD attacking Rev3[1], someone should create a rev3 section on the site.
The controversy is still unfolding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dextr0us (talk • contribs) 16:57, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Yes, and it looks to be quite grave, especially considering the previous scandals that mire MediaDefender. --24.91.98.99 (talk) 02:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Another source for the incident: Dailytech article —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.233.91.166 (talk) 20:04, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
-
[edit] Rev3
Something has to be done about this. Although this is not wikinews. This shoudln't disentagrate into bashing mediadefender which is obviously seems justified considering mos computer users hate this company. But this is wikipedia. Standards must be upheld. Thus this article should remain information and when there is reliable info about rev3 (might be some time) than it can be added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aceofspades1217 (talk • contribs) 04:55, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Viide
I am thinking that since Viide another MediaDefender project that we should link up the name to MediaDefender or at least make a stub about this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by N@vi (talk • contribs) 22:00, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
-I agree... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.197.12.183 (talk) 17:03, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
