User talk:Meaningful Username

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Meaningful Username, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  Bubba hotep 01:01, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Ahmed Abd Rapo

Hi Meaningful_Username

I have added more referneces to Ahmed Abd Rapo page which was listed in speedy deletion pages for notability reasons. I put a link for Ahmed Abd Rapo's meeting with Al-Jazeera channel, which is a reliable source.

I hope wikipedia don't delete my page and remove the afd. —The preceding

AbdulRahman14 comment was added by AbdulRahman14 (talk • contribs) 13:09, 16 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Your edit to Lauren Emcleans

Your recent edit to Lauren Emcleans (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 17:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Userpage vandalism

You're very welcome. Glad I could help! Will (aka Wimt) 21:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 86.13.33.67

86.13.33.67 (talk • contribs) is already blocked, hence the attacks ;). Thanks for the reversion though. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 09:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Re: Scaryduck 'vandalism'

Hey! What do you think you're doing, reverting my supposed 'vandalism'? If you knew Scaryduck like I do, you'd know that he is actually always going on about Sharon 'piss-on-my-tits' psycho ex-girlfriend. I insist you learn more about your subjects, or put the article back as it was. THIS IS YOUR FIRST AND ONLY WARNING.

[edit] que?

oh lighten up. seriously, the Randstad or however the hell you spell it already has "Hot Issues" which is already risgay. why not make it smokin' hot. i do not see the harm.--68.192.27.4 01:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Birdflesh.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Birdflesh.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 11:26, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Humanfeel.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Humanfeel.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 20:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Birdfleshlogo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Birdfleshlogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:21, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Vicious Art

A tag has been placed on Vicious Art requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jfire (talk) 21:14, 22 January 2008 (UTC)