User talk:Mdb1370

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Mdb1370, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Madchester 07:27, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] AfD nomination of Jacq LaMarche

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jacq LaMarche, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacq LaMarche. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 20:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RE:Jacq LaMarche

Hello Mdb1370. I didn't nominated the article Jacq LaMarche for deletion. It was nominated by User:Clarityfiend. If you have any problem, you can argue with him. And, I strikeout the term "total crap" from AfD[1]. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 02:55, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of From Petoskey to Prague

An editor has nominated From Petoskey to Prague, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/From Petoskey to Prague and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] All Because of Agatha

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article All Because of Agatha, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 19:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Olympics

I removed it because I think it was going into too much detail about stuff that doesn't really impact the games. The fact that it was named "best sports city" will have little to no impact on their bid, so I don't think it is worth mentioning. Generally, the sections should be kept brief and only have essential info. -- Scorpion0422 21:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Players and pennants

As another user stated, players don't win pennants. Please see discussion on project page. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 10:23, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't buy it, but the consensus on the project page seems to support your take on it; in fact, I was going to revert Badger "pending project discussion", but you kind of beat me to it. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 02:59, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] please avoid an edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hank Aaron. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Kingturtle (talk) 11:58, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Specifically, you should use the talk page for WP:Baseball, since there is a discussion thread started there, and this covers a number of articles. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 12:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pennants

I want to start out by saying that I am not following your edits, these players are on my watchlist, and I check it daily and I saw that you are adding these. The reason I dont believe that they should have the pennants is that no one remembers the losers in World Series games. Also if the pennants are so important why arent there templates about the pennant winners, as there is for the World Series winners. Please don't add any more (and I wont remove them) until this issue is solved, Lets continue this discussion at WP:Baseball--Yankees10 22:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)