User talk:MCVerstappen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I'm a newbie. Plain for all to see :)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello, MCVerstappen! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dlohcierekim Deleted? 01:22, 15 February 2008 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

[edit] Supavadee Phangkaew

Erm, excuse me, are you the model herself--you appear to be one from your edits.

Perhaps it would be good if you can provide some external web links to the model in person; articles without external links are dubious and are subjected to scrutiny under Wikipedia:Cite your sources: If you have any web links of the model it would be beneficial to secure the article's credibility; I do not want articles to be labelled "citation needed" tags by tgose sysops. Feel free to ask me any questions if necessary. Thank you.Mr Tan (talk) 06:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Willis (Political Scientist) recreation of deleted article deleted

Please see the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Willis. Dlohcierekim Deleted? 23:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Michael Willis, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dlohcierekim Deleted? 00:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Willis|, as you did to Michael Willis}}. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

[edit] Please stop disrupting Michael Willis

The article will not be "back to the political scientist." You cannot usurp this article name like that. Furthermore, as has been repeated before. The political scientist article was deleted because no verifiable sources were provided to assert the subject's meeting WP:BIO. Your vandalistic edits to this article have not helped your cause. Your actions of adding irrelevant content to this article and moving this article and its talk page are disruptive. You need to stop doing that. It's getting you nowhere and undermines whatever claim to reasonableness you might have. Obviously, from the sources provided, there is a Michael Willis who is an America actor. The article about the other Michael Willis was deleted as the result of this deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Willis. Feel free to recreate Michael Willis (Political Scientist) when you can provide verifiable sources. Cheers, and happy editing. Dlohcierekim 17:07, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rhetoric

BTW the "vandal" rhetoric is getting old. The political scientist article was deleted by community consensus. If one who edits against consensus is a vandal, then to whom does the label apply? Calling those who disagree with you vandals is inflammatory, disruptive and insulting. It is an empty cliché and perhaps even lame. It only undermines your position. Dlohcierekim 17:16, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

I've contacted Natalie for comment. In the meantime, it appears that you and Ernie have a fair amount in common -- is there an explanation for that which doesn't involve violations of WP:SOCK? Any answer would be appreciated. – Luna Santin (talk) 10:43, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

I've blocked the sockpuppet Ernienotsowise (talk · contribs) indefinitely and applied a 48-hour block to this account. MCVerstappen: read our policy against sockpuppetry for an explanation. This was a transparent attempt to use false accounts to give the appearance of support for a position that has no support. Mangojuice^talk 15:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

This looks pretty cut and dried to me as well. The underlying IP has also made similar edits to Michael Willis. Natalie (talk) 22:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Wow, I would never have imagined sockpuppetry was afoot. Dlohcierekim 02:50, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Agenda 2000

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Agenda 2000, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.rp6.de/durchfuehrung/glossar?GlossarBuchstabe=a&GlossarSprache=en. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)