User talk:McNoddy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Damaen Kelly
Hi mate, I know Damaen is not the usual spelling of Damien but that is how Damaen spells it! go figure. Here, here, here and here cheers --Vintagekits 14:45, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Mc, Any reason why you removed that Damean is from the Turf? I think I remember that you are from the Turf also. Look forward to your reply. regards--Vintagekits 12:32, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- No problems, it already does state that he boxed in the Turf Lodge club so that flags the The Turf up anyway.--Vintagekits 12:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Edit to Carlos Tévez
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Carlos Tévez, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Also, while Tevez celebrating with the fans might have been a memorable moment for the spectators, it's ultimately a rather irrelevant piece of trivia in the whole scheme of things, and doesn't belong in an encyclopedia article. It's probably better for Wikinews or an account of that specific match. --Ytny (talk) 14:19, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Miscarriage. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. -Severa (!!!) 11:07, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hi
Sure, I'm glad to chime in regarding "woman" versus "mother". However, don't expect common sense to prevail. :) Ferrylodge 22:58, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] I need some assistance
Hi McNoddy, you may recall leaving a comment at my talk page recently (regarding the word "mother" in the miscarriage article). Anyway, I was wondering if you could help me a little bit. Please see here.
Also, please consider setting up your Wikipedia email account, using "my preferences" at the top of your screen. Thanks, and I hope to hear back from you.Ferrylodge 17:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] June, 2007
With regards to your comments on User:Orangemarlin: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Orangemarlin 14:26, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
-
- Bugger off and stop leaving sly remarks on other talk pages--McNoddy 14:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- "you dork" followed by "bugger off"? McNoddy, take a break from Wikipedia and consider your actions here. You are gaining nothing by your rudeness and attacks, and are instead behaving in an inappropriate manner, which would tend to ensure you will not have good relations with your fellow editors, rather than the reverse. KillerChihuahua?!? 19:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
-
- I agree with KillerChihuahua. Your behavior appears more of a personal attack that the other user's criticism of your grammar. You can't really preface a NPA notice by telling somebody to bugger off. It really doesn't work that way. Happy editing. —Gaff ταλκ 19:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- McNoddy, I've always found this a rather bizarre adage, but you can win more flies with honey than you can with vinegar. If you would like to let Orangemarlin know that you would prefer it if he wouldn't correct your grammar in the future, then tell him so, simply. I don't think you're going to convince anyone to reconsider how their grammar correction is interpreted if you call them a "dork" and tell them to "bugger off." -Severa (!!!) 02:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Agree --Lsi john 14:53, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
-
- "you dork" followed by "bugger off"? McNoddy, take a break from Wikipedia and consider your actions here. You are gaining nothing by your rudeness and attacks, and are instead behaving in an inappropriate manner, which would tend to ensure you will not have good relations with your fellow editors, rather than the reverse. KillerChihuahua?!? 19:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
-
[edit] Thanks for the advise
I really don't want you posting anything further on my talk page so please refrain from doing so--McNoddy 09:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Mc a chara, word to the wise. If you dont chill out admin WILL block your account and IP permanently - take a wee bit of advice from someone you have hostorically had a good relationship with and someone who has sailed close to the wind also and chill out. If you need any help, advice or assistance please do not hesitate to either contact me on my talk page or send my an email via my userpage. slan.--Vintagekits 10:20, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] July 2007
Please do not add unreferenced controversial information to Wikipedia articles on living persons, as you did to Rocardo Palmera. Thank you. Xiaphias 09:33, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'll try not to, this guy is npte worthy, am not trying to get peiople to check out the http://www.freericardopalmera.org/ so y would you add it. I've for other news sites that cite the info I've supplied. regards --McNoddy 10
-
- 01, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah I never said he wasn't noteworthy, I said his page contained controversial/defamatory info with no sources cited. But I added a ref to remedy that. --Xiaphias 10
-
- 04, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- now notice that this guy already has a wiki page, I assumed he hadn't (speedy delete should go ahead)Simón TrinidadI created this page in good faith faith, please don't accuse me adding controversial information--McNoddy 10
- 12, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- You said he was a Colombian FARC rebel leader, a terrorist, and a drug trafficker without citing any sources.[7] That's pretty controversial. Anyways, It's all moot now I suppose; I'll redirect the page to the one which already exists. --Xiaphias 10
- 17, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- I said 'supposely a Colombian FARC rebel leader', stands accused of these actuations. You jelly head--McNoddy 10
- 32, 3 July 2007 (UTC)