User talk:Mceder

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives
Beginning of time - July 2006

[edit] Ogham Coincidence

Hi mceder I noticed your interest and remembered a program i had seen on TV about ogham insciptions on late roman/early saxon town houses of the roman name and info of the owner of the house(in latin but using ogham script). Thought it was very strange and a recent discovery i'll try and remember more info, i know it was a BBC program called "Meet the Ancestors" and was a one hour on a romano-british town.Hypnosadist 00:25, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Which edits are you referring to? Black people listening to rap music is wickid controversial d00d Josh16 00:48, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The structure of Hezbollah article

Hi,

There is discussion about the structure of Hezbollah article. Please read all of them and tell us your idea.--Sa.vakilian 03:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Not sure what happend.

First time it said a minor edit when it was not(A sign of vandalism). 2nd time I'm not sure what happend I think it might of been a mistake with somthing elese.---Scott3 _Talk _{Contributions} _{Count: 950+} 01:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] terrorist

is a subjective term. There is no generally accepted definition. Thus the quotation marks. Rm uk 03:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Hezbollah/Archive lead

Hi. Thank you for this effort.

I want to know you move the text to this archive or copy it.--Sa.vakilian 04:39, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

I prefer to copy the text because we need a chronological archive too.--Sa.vakilian 02:24, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Removal of Terrorist category

I agree that this category should not exist, but I am concerned about the reverting happening on the Baruch Goldstein article. I saw you have tried to get the category deleted before but was unable to reach consensus and that is a shame.

There is no official policy on Wikipedia that states to avoid the word Terrorist. There is Wikipedia:Words to avoid, which is a guide... And it argues both for and against the use of said word! What it does state is that the word should be used in a manner that describes who is calling them what. Is a notable organisation calling Baruch Goldstein a terrorist and are there reputable sources that backs that up? If so, I believe the category should remain. mceder (u t c) 16:44, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

I agree he is a terrorist. However, I think such a category creates a list of "Terrorists according to Wikipedia" which is a violation of WP:NPOV. Whether sources are provided is irrelevent in my opinion; a category of 'Accused terrorists' would be OK, but by adding someone to such a category as simply 'Terrorists' basically says Wikipedia agrees with the source, which it cannot do. Thus, while he is clearly a terrorist, there are lots of other people that belong on the list that are not there because some people object to their being labelled as a terrorist. So long as this subjectivity continues, it is not fair to label anyone as a terrorist 'according to Wikipedia.' —Aiden 19:45, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Sweden

This WikiProject is now officially started. I suggest you first read the new scope and goals of the project. If you still agree, please sign att the members section.

Fred-Chess 18:31, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Organizational Chart of the Hezbollah

Hi, could you please help us with making this chart in wikipeida:[1]--Sa.vakilian 03:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

That's great. Thanks a lot. But I guess we have some problem with copy right rule. Because it has derived from "In the path of Hezbollah" by Ahmad Nezar Hamze and on the other hand its reliability depends on that book.--Sa.vakilian 11:31, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Moving info. to a new article

I made Funding of Hezbollah and moved some part of Hezbollah#Funding to it. It may cause some problem about ref. Please check both of them.--Sa.vakilian 06:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Verifying the references

Salam Alaykum

Could you please help us in Talk:Hezbollah#Verifying the references ?--Sa.vakilian 03:55, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Please come and help us to finish verification of Hezbollah references.talk:Hezbollah#Verifying the references--Sa.vakilian 16:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nomination as a good article

Salam. I think Hezbollah has reached to good article criteria and I want to nominate it. Please write your idea in talk:Hezbollah#Good article nomination--Sa.vakilian(t-c) 06:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Al-Manar

Salam. This article is nominated as a GA while it hasn't reached GA criteria. I wrote a review and put On Hold tag on it:talk:Al-Manar#Good enough?. We should improve it in a week. Can you please help us with it? God bless you.--Sa.vakilian(t-c) 04:56, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Salam. You can find other versions of dead links if you search on the basis of their titles. God bless you.--Sa.vakilian(t-c) 19:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hezbollah:GA on hold

The article Hezbollah ... has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Hezbollah for things needed to be addressed. LordHarris 18:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi, please help us with Hezbollah. We can reach GA criteria En sha Allah.--Sa.vakilian(t-c) 02:33, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

		The Editor's Barnstar
		I appreciate your editions in Hezbollah article which led to achievement GA criteria. Sa.vakilian(t-c) 19:47, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Flogging molly within a mile of home cd cover.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Flogging molly within a mile of home cd cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Flogging molly swagger cd cover.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Flogging molly swagger cd cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:Image:Daytona bike week 2006 official logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Image:Daytona bike week 2006 official logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Rudeness by that admin

I am very sorry that you were insulted by that user on Talk:Fear of dogs, and I am even more sorry that the person who insulted you was an administrator who is supposed to know better. You as an editor deserve and environment where you are not insulted over a simple content dispute, and it is a real shame that the very folks that are supposed to protect you from that sort of thing are throwing it at you.

I have given that admin a warning about personal attacks, which was not received well. I give you my assurances that I will be watching that admins contributions closely from here on. Please do not let his behavior intimidate you from any page you wish to edit. ((1 == 2) ? (('Stop') : ('Go')) 21:37, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

No problems and no sweat. I am not bothered by name calling or pissed off admins.. mceder (u t c) 18:28, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Poll

Hello. I have decided to start a poll to get a better idea of what the consensus is on the hezbollah article. The poll is on the Hezbollah articles talk page. Thought you might want to know so you could include yourself in it. Cheers!--I wish you a happy Veterans Day 22:21, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reviewing Hezbollah

Hi, I've nominated Hezbollah for peer review and a semi-automatic javascript program put a review there on the base of WP:MS. Can you please check the article and add Y mark here.--Seyyed(t-c) 05:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ryanair Changes

Hi, can you please explain your recent changes to the RyanAir page. Thanks. 84.9.109.96 (talk) 23:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] My Rfa

My effort to regain adminship was unsuccessful, But I wanted to thank you for taking some time out of your day to voice your opinion.--MONGO 19:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Trm clash of the tartans.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Trm clash of the tartans.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hope you're interested!

Hello! Your editing history indicates that you might be interested in joining the Ancient Germanic studies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the history, language and culture of the Ancient Germanic peoples. We also maintain the Ancient Germanic culture WikiPortal. If you are interested in contributing, you are welcome to sign up at the project page. Thanks!

Wish to join us? –Skadinaujo T•C 12:31, 9 June 2008 (UTC)