Talk:McEwan's
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject. | |
| Stub | rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
Contents |
[edit] Beer descriptions are confused
Hmmm.. 70 bob as "the real ale version" version of 60 bob? A wee heavy as "mild"? I don't know what McEwans sells these days, but this is just confused Neil Leslie 22:55, 22 October 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Ads from early 90s
The ad series from the early 90s was very witty, featuring some Geordies traveling to exotic places, but complaining because they couldn't get any McEwan's Export. Does anyone remember more words to those ads? One started and ended
Florida's horrider than Whitley Bay,
There's no McEwan's Export in the USA
...
Goodbye Mickey Mouse, hello Tyne and Wier,
States nice place, shame about the beer.
Paulgush 04:37, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Moved page
Moved page from McEwans brewery to McEwans beer as I feel that the brands are more important the brewery and that any information about the brewery should be kept in the history section.Mr Eko Let You Live 21:27, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
The following line should have been placed in the discussion rather than the article. Note: 70/ and 8% abv are mutually inconsistent. The 70/ may be its International Bitterness Units rating. It can (and currently is being) read from the label at the top of the bottle that the Scotch Ale does in fact have "8.0% alc/vol".
Further more 70/- is NOT its International Bitterness Units rating but stands for shilling hence /- and as far as I can tell 8% is the same as 8.0%
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Mcewanslogo.JPG
Image:Mcewanslogo.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Mcewanssessions.jpg
Image:Mcewanssessions.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:52, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
