McDonald v. Smith

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 The introduction to this article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject.
Please help improve the article with a good introductory style.
McDonald v. Smith
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued March 20, 1985
Decided June 19, 1985
Full case name: McDonald v. Smith
Citations: 472 U.S. 479
Prior history: Petitioner removed the case to Federal District Court on the basis of diversity of citizenship. District Court rejected absolute immunity. Upheld by on appeal, Fourth Circuit.
Holding
"The Petition Clause does not provide absolute immunity to defendants charged with expressing libelous and damaging falsehoods in petitions to Government officials."
Court membership
Chief Justice: Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices: William J. Brennan, Jr., Byron White, Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William Rehnquist, John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor
Case opinions
Majority by: Burger
Joined by: Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, White, O'Conner, Renhquist, Stevens
Concurrence by: Brennan
Joined by: Marshall, Blackmun
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. I

McDonald v. Smith, 472 U.S. 479 (1985), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the right to petition does not provide absolute immunity to petitioners; it is subject to the same restrictions as other First Amendment rights.

Contents

[edit] Background

In 1981, David Smith brought a libel suit against Robert McDonald claiming that the latter had included knowing and malicious lies about him in a letter to the President concerning Smith's possible appointment as a United States attorney. Smith claimed that these libelous claims damaged both his chances of appointment and his reputation and career. McDonald first had the case removed to federal court on the basis of diversity of citizenship and then moved for judgment on the pleadings on the grounds that the Petition Clause of the First Amendment protected his right express his views without limitation as long as it was part of a constitutionally protected petition.

[edit] Issue

The issue before the court was whether the right to petition the government granted absolute immunity from liability.

[edit] Decision

The court decided 8-0 (Justice Powell took no part in the case) that the right to petition was subject to the same legal limitations that the rights to speech and the press are as previously decided in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. Chief Justice Burger delivered the opinion of the court, in which all other members joined. Justice Brennan wrote a concurrence joined by Justices Marshall and Blackmun.

[edit] See also

[edit] External links