From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to pre-Columbian Mesoamerica, its civilizations, history, accomplishments and other topics. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page. |
Resources and guidelines for editing Mesoamerica-related articles:
Guidelines— Outline of suggested guidelines and editing conventions
Resources— Selected resources and compendia of Mesoamerican sources and studies
Citations— Bibliography and pre-filled citations for Mesoamerican sources
Journals— Links to selected journals publishing Mesoamerican research, example citation templates
Article listing— Inventory and watchlists of WP:MESO articles and their talk pages (Article Watchlist)—(Talkpage Watchlist)
Worklists— Project worklists and activities
|
NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritising and managing its workload. |
B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. |
High |
This article has been rated as High-importance on the Project's importance scale. |
WikiProject Mesoamerica priority open tasks: (click "show" to expand)
|
This article needs serious revision. It is based (loosely) on ethnohistoric accounts, without regards to the archaeological research. Better treatment of the Carnegie project's work should be included, as well as the most recent work at the site by INAH (under Carlos Peraza), and also by Marilyn Masson of Grinnel College. Chunchucmil 14:09, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Questionable use of Authority Claim
I find Carnegie Institute's dispositions at Yucatan are suspicious in regard of the political history of the institute. What is the local populations impression?
--Xact (talk) 02:43, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- I find your comment difficult to interpret. Are you saying, the results of Carnegie-sponsored investigations ought to be regarded with suspicion and their reliability questioned, on account of some supposed political motive or worldview held or promoted by the Institution? Or....? And what do you intend by 'local population[']s impression'? You'll have to clarify, please...--cjllw ʘ TALK 12:50, 26 January 2008 (UTC)