User talk:Maxim/archives/sep07

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Please refactor

Please refactor your WP:ANI post stamped 23:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC) DurovaCharge! 00:24, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rogue!

You are a rogue admin Maxim! Wiping out Ariel's comment like that... What a rebel... :D -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 01:12, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

You are the rogue! You do whatever you want! :) -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 01:18, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image removal

Could you please fix the script you're using to remove images? It's making mistakes whenever an image caption contains a hyperlink, such as [1]. --Carnildo 04:28, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 85.197.16.0/22's block

Hi, we received an unblock request on the miling list from an user from this range about this block. I checked his IP (85.197.16.179) and it is not a TOR proxy at the moment. Do you have reasons to believe this whole range is constituted of TORs? -- lucasbfr talk 10:40, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Paedophile naming thing

I think this needs slightly more sensitivity than you showed in case it is genuine. You should try and at least tell them where to post rather than just biting them. Secretlondon 20:15, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

The link was firstly broken and A search didn't turn up anything, so I presumed it more of a hoax, but decided to tell at least that it was the wrong noticeboard. I didn't feel that the circumstance were calling for anything more. Maxim(talk) 20:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Well I left them a note on their talk page. This sort of stuff can blow up in our face if we are not careful. Secretlondon 10:16, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Two images

I noticed that you didn't delete Image:Georgi-Gladyshev.jpg or Image:EToS band.jpg. I hate asking again, but could you explain your reasoning for them? As far as I can tell both are replaceable nonfree images. — Carl (CBM · talk) 20:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

E-mails. But maybe I'm making a mistake with a policy. BTW, feel free to badger me, as I'm a very new image deleter, and even without being sysop, I have very little experience in that area. I've tried to do because the backlog was piling up... Unfortunately, making mistakes is often the way to learn. Maxim(talk) 20:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Any help with the backlogs is greatly appreciated; I don't mind making my case if I think a mistake was made, so please don't take any offense by it.
Those two images do have emails, but that doesn't make them free images. If we only have permission to use the image on Wikipedia, that isn't a free license, and so all the NFCC criteria still apply. It's actually better that these images have the emails posted, because that makes it easier to check that the license is not a free license. In order to make the image free, the email would need to explicitly say that the license was GFDL, CC-BY-SA, public domain, or some other free license. The Georgi image clearly has a non-free license release; it explicitly says it's for use on Wikipedia. The other email seems confused; what is "some sort of public domain"? Moreover, the copyright for the image most likely belongs to the record label, not the individual band members. We would need permission from the label to release the image into public domain.
Several users have contacted me when I tagged images for deletion to clarify the license release. We even got some images released under GfDL that were previously not free. But in this case neither of the user who uploaded thse images has disputed the fact that the images are not under a free license.
Although I occasionally make mistakes, when checking for replaceable fair use I try to verify these things:
  • The images doesn't have a free license tag.
  • If a picture of a person, the person is still living and accessible to the public (not in prison, missing in war, etc.)
  • If a picture of a band, the band is still performing together.
— Carl (CBM · talk) 20:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] CSD

I thought that the backlog tag only applied to text articles. Am I wrong? If so, you are wholly correct and I apologise. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 22:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

I think so. There are instructions in near the adminbacklog tag, which excludes only the separate categories. Maxim(talk) 22:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
OK. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 22:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Trackplans

A lot of the Sydney rail trackplans have been removed from their respective pages by other users, despite the wishes of others (and myself). Therefore I am reluctant to put any more effort into the remaining ones. Quaidy 23:55, 2 September 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Two images

I'm not sure whether you intended to archive this thread without commenting on it? If so, that's fine; it just isn't clear. — Carl (CBM · talk) 19:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I deleted them, as I was wrong. Maxim(talk) 19:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
I should have noticed the red links, but I didn't. I'm sorry to have bothered you about it again. Your work in cleaning up the image categories is emphatically appreciated by people who know what a pain it is. — Carl (CBM · talk) 19:41, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] And...

I replied :). ~ Wikihermit 19:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Mazzuca,Robert-NF-012.jpg

Question about the speedy deletion of Image:Mazzuca,Robert-NF-012.jpg. You say, "Speedy deleted per (CSD i7), was an image with an invalid fair use rationale and the uploader was notified more than 48 hours ago."

First, how and where was I notified more than 48 hours ago that you were going to delete this image and Second dosn't CSD i7 state that "Fair use images...including no use rationale whatsoever, may be speedy deleted 48 hours after notification to the editor who uploaded the image is given." My image had a rationale despite you finding it to be invalid. Please help me understand. Thanks. --Jdurbach 00:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

You were notified that the image was a replaceable nonfree image; you placed a tag on the image page in response on August 30. The image was deleted per WP:CSD#I7, which says "Invalid fair-use claim. Non-free images or media that fail any part of the non-free content criteria and were uploaded after 2006-07-13 may be deleted forty-eight hours after notification of the uploader. " This image fails WP:NFCC#1 - a nonfree picture of a living person used to illustrate the appearance of that person is considered replaceable. I see nothing amiss in this deletion. — Carl (CBM · talk) 00:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Whoops

Yes that was me, I forgot to log in. You were fast and edit conflicted me before I could fix it. Fixed now :-) Regards, Húsönd 01:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Yep, it was about time

We do now have a presumptive suspect ( Naius (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) ) in the spree, it was about time to protect the page. Thanks! Georgewilliamherbert 02:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your turn now...

You protected the page... you get the vandal. Figures. You should probably semi yourself, I bet. Gscshoyru 02:10, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My talk page

Thanks for reverting, I'm actually taking a turn weeding out socks, it's rather fun. Maxim(talk) 02:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

It is fun. I get a very peculiar high from reverting vandals and watching them get blocked. You should probably semi your talk page though... you caught the vandal you protected against. Gscshoyru 02:17, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you for the nom

Thank you once again for the excellent nomination. It meant a great deal, to have someone make such an offer, and write such a great statement. I hope I will prove competent with the new buttons. Happy editing! -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] re User:216.204.18.2 block for 400 days

Just to advise you that the talkpage for the above account mentions a max of 1 year (365 days) for blocks - in case anyone else queries it. For the record, I support the tariff imposed. LessHeard vanU 12:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My RFA

Thanks for the nom Maxim, however I withdrew at 28/18/6. Thanks again. ~ Wikihermit 15:16, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Question I can't help but ask

Just curious, what was your reasoning behind this? Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 22:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

See my RfA... probably. The image vandalism was hillarious, and I couldn't resists, but it earned two neutrals in my RfA :(, so I don't suggest that others repeat this. Maxim(talk) 22:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "You never told me to relax. :D"

I was too busy building your userpage! Which you baleeted, by the way! :p ~ Riana ⁂ 03:56, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

I deleted, than I restored with the same design, but I finally made up my mind that my talk page has all I need, I don't link to it, and I prefer a slash-link. Maxim(talk) 18:39, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dear Maxim

For being such a busy bee at CSD, and just to let you know your extremely hard work is much, much appreciated, I gift you this little Star that moves on forever, just as you slowly and steadily work for the best of us all. Keep it up, my friend! :) Love,
Phaedriel - 02:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your rant

I've been plugging away at C:CSD recently (including a few images) as of late. If you think the backlog's getting out of hand, drop me a line and I'll help you trim it down. Cheers, Caknuck 03:56, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

I probably will. Thanks for the offer! Maxim(talk) 20:08, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
I saw your rant also. Apologies for causing you trouble. Was not my intent to add to your burdens since you blocked me for the 3RR. I know admins usually don't get an apology from the folks they have blocked, but you were right to do so. Thank you. Benkenobi18 21:59, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Recent deletion of Krabi Krabong pic

Hi,

I have noticed that you have removed the Krabi Krabong pic from my page which was explained that it was speedily deleted. Would there be a page on Wikipedia that would possibly have a list of pics that are on the verge of speedy deletion so I can keep a track of what pics to use or not? Regards. Wiki Raja 04:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

I replied on your talkpage. Maxim(talk) 20:09, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Enforcers Spider-Man cover

Hi. Just wondering about the deletion since the image wasn't tagged with a warning. (See caption here.) Can you shed some light? Thanks! --Tenebrae 04:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

It had no fair use rationale. If you want to readd one, send me the rationale, and I'll restore it. Maxim(talk) 20:11, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Let's Share a cookie!

For I know how WP:PRODSUM cleaning can be a branwashing job :) (unfortunately I often find the list empty when I go through it. I assume you're partly to blame!) -- lucasbfr talk 09:03, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Unfortunately I've also being finding it empty lately, but thanks for the cookies! Maxim(talk) 20:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] In your honour

See my 12:47 entry here --Dweller 12:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much, I've decide to come back a bit cooled off. Maxim(talk) 20:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for September 3rd, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 36 3 September 2007 About the Signpost
From the editor: Interview with Jimbo Wales
WikiScanner tool expands, poses public relations problems for Dutch royal family WikiWorld comic: "George P. Burdell"
News and notes: Fundraiser, Wikimania 2008, milestones Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 04:09, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sdurrant

Good work re:User:Sdurrant. Thank you. AndyJones 19:14, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I highly appreciate your compliment. Maxim(talk) 19:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

... for the assist in Category:Images with unknown source as of 30 August 2007. Thought I was going to be plugging away in there forever today. --Spike Wilbury ♫ talk 21:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] MTV Generation

Hi. I'm sorry but there is no way that this is a valid candidate for a speedy deletion under A7, and hoax/other problems is not a valid criteria. This is so obviously not a candidate that I have restored it. I don't want you to feel that I am wheel-warring, but this really is absolutely not a speedy and is a very well known subject, that I felt needed to be immediately restored. Cheers TigerShark 00:01, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Eleventh Commandment (disambiguation)

This is also clearly not valid for a speedy under G1, because it does not match the definition of Wikipedia:Patent nonsense. This is nowhere near as blatant as MTV Generation, so I have no intention of restoring it without discussion with you. Cheers TigerShark 00:07, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] London Buses route 268

Again, this does not fit in the criteria of A7 (as it is a bus route) or, as far as I can see, under any other speedy criteria. Again, I will not touch it without discussion with you. Cheers TigerShark 00:08, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

PROD both of them. I think I'm a bit too tired to handle CSD right now, I'm logging off and going to sleep. Maxim(talk) 00:10, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Sweet Dreams, Maxim! Ariel♥Gold 00:26, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
OK, I have recreated them for now. I have not prodded them, as I don't feel they need to be deleted - but I assume that you will want to do so. Cheers TigerShark 00:26, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Olivo Barbieri: not speedy material

This edit of yours to Higashikawa Prize popped up on my watch list. The article includes a table showing every prizewinner. Most are red links, but the blue links in the column for "Overseas Photographer Prize" include a couple of very eminent names. Thanks to your edit, there's now a single non-link, to Olivo Barbieri. Your edit summary reads: (Removing backlinks to Olivo Barbieri that has been speedily deleted per (CSD A7);). And it turns out that it was you who speedily deleted this article (whose existence I hadn't noticed) per CSD A7.

I find both decisions extraordinary. The article was indeed unsourced and mediocre (as are most new articles) but did assert notability for use of a photographic technique (or less charitably a photographic gimmick) -- one that has considerable popularity (and has been employed by one of the two latest winners of the Kimura Ihei Award). According to a sourced WP article that you knew of, the photographer had one at least one award, admittedly a minor one but also one that put him together with Sternfeld, Meyerowitz, Baltz, and Iturbide. While googling doesn't immediately bring up any particularly impressive story, it does bring thousands of hits, such as this one, which mentions a six-week solo exhibition in NYC, admittedly a commercial exhibition, but nevertheless hardly the kind of thing that's typical of CSD A7 fodder.

So I urge you to undelete. You'd then of course be welcome to take the article to AfD, whereupon I would argue for "Keep". -- Hoary 00:56, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Ugh. I had a downright terrible CSD A7 outing as you can see above. Let's say I restored, restored the link, and now I'm with a fresh mind, I can see the downright mess I spawned yesterday. Sorry. :~( Maxim(talk) 11:22, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Spoken like a gentleperson! -- Hoary 00:11, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Closing FLCs

I understand your eagerness to close this nomination, but you forgot to provide some comments (i.e. promote/fail) and sign at the end. Could you add them now?--Crzycheetah 01:43, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

I left them, but they didn't show up for some reason. If you check my first closing diff, you'll see them. Maxim(talk) 11:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image

So what ? That image can be on diffrent name - but that is the same image. You shuld`n undo my edits. Pmgpmg 10:30, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

I concur. Conscious 10:48, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
On second thoughts, I agree that you might refuse deletion instead of replacing links. Conscious 10:58, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
You reverted some of my edits - if you don`t wanna check links and correct links to image on commons then why you doing this ? Pmgpmg 12:21, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
I have no clue what you want me to do. I don't recall reverting you, and can you at least provide me a link to the page you're referencing? Maxim(talk) 12:23, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
You have deleted my template {{subst:ncd}} from ship`s image. That link who are insert higher now is dead because some admin deleted image - but you are reverted at most 4 my edits.
In example you reverted my edist on Image:USS North Carolina BB-55.jpg (then was another image on en wiki - now is on commons). I moved that photo to commons and on commons that image has diffrent name - Image:USS North Carolina BB-55-2.jpg. And you was reverted my edit because on commons that image has diffrent name. I moved that photo on 27 August and you was reverted my edit (if my memory are good) yesterday.
In my opinion i was doing that what is good. I moved in the same way something about 400 images (all american submarines and battleships), and you are the first user who reverts my edits. So - I am very suprise. Pmgpmg 13:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
PS. - On en wiki users don`t anserws on talk page user who talk with them ? Pmgpmg 13:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Day By The River.jpg

Hi... User:Clickwithus re-uploaded this file after you had speedied it as a copyvio, this time with a fair-use rationale claiming it's an album cover. I'm not sure how plausible that claim is. It's not square, there's no text on it, and I can't find an image of the supposed album cover with a google search -- none of which is definitive, but... The only place I can find this image is here, where it has exactly the same filename as the uploaded image.

The article Day By The River also seems pretty spammy, which doesn't bolster the credibility of the claim. --Rrburke(talk) 12:00, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] pottercruft

Hi, I am surprised by the deletion of Harry Potter newspapers and magazines because it didnt look clear-cut and you didnt give any reasoning. I had only recently expanded the article being considered and little time was given for any feedback on the changes. Could you take another look at the references I added for the Daily Prophet section of the article; one of them was a newspaper article entirely devoted to these fictional newspapers (the books are all in google books if you want to double check those references). Cheers, John Vandenberg 15:21, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Dear John.,
I felt there was consensus to delete. I had weighed the arguments and I felt that the community felt that the list belonged more or less on something like Harry Potter Wiki. Wikipedia does run by consensus. I have hope that answered your question. Yours truly, Maxim(talk) 18:05, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
As I said, I dont see how the consensus was to delete, but that isnt the point. I had updated the article soon before you closed it and asked for more opinion on the Afd. Since you closed it before further input was made, I had hoped that you would take the time to explain why you personally felt that despite my improvements it was still an unacceptable article based on policy/guidelines/whatever. If you take the time, I think you will see that some of the arguments such as Loving the term "Pottercruft". No secondary sources cited (or even available) no longer held any water. If you dont wish to review the outcome or improvements I made, could you restore it to User:Jayvdb/Saved pages/Harry Potter newspapers and magazines so that I can continue to work on it. Thank you, John Vandenberg 00:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] KlipFolio

For some reason, I don't know why, I decided to go through the KlipFolio entry (which incidently had been running under Klipfolio with no capital F since your deletion of main article) and clean it up, restore it, and make it half readable. There must have been 20 links for the word Klip, all of the linking within the same article! Anway, now that I have done that, and removed what I thought was some pointless praising of the software (though I could be wrong), I would like to know in more detail why you originally removed the article. Just so you know, I have never used the product (it doesn't really sound very interesting), but I was just in despair at the current state of it, which means I don't know much about the product, but I want to see if the article actually deserves to stay in the wiki or not :)
Bistromaths 21:45, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laetitia Zonzambé

I saw your comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laetitia Zonzambé on sockpuppets. See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Myth1727. --Edcolins 01:28, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Eleventyseven

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Eleventyseven. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Chubbles 04:57, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] King Clancy Trophy FLC

The white space is between the heading King Clancy Memorial Trophy Winnersand the table itself. The info box drops down too far, forcing the table down due to its width. This creates a white space starting from the bottom of 'current holder' in the info box to the bottom of the box. The best way to get rid of it would be to add more of an intro and/or add more history to the prose sections. ludahai 魯大海 11:59, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Expanding either the history section or the introductory section would eliminate the whitespace. Pictures on the side, while welcome, would NOT do anything to help. ludahai 魯大海 12:12, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks!

Thanks for considering to keep the images in Creative ZEN. You've been very generous.--Jw21/PenaltyKillah(discuss•edits) 17:35, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gratefully....

received!! Your nomination and support (along with that of others) has moved my timescale marginally forward. I thank you for the trust you have put in me. Pedro |  Chat  21:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

I've sent you an email. Also, nice to see SOMEONE checked Pedro's contribs instead of just nomming him :P Dihydrogen Monoxide 07:26, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Problem

You could share your problems with me, only if you want to. It reduces the burden and I could probably help you out with them. You could also email me, if private. Just concerned for a co-human. --AltruismT a l k - Contribs. 05:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hub Group

Hello, your speedy deletion of Hub Group was improper. It's #972 on the Fortune 1000 list, which by its nature as one of the 1000 largest companies in the United States by revenue makes it notable. Please restore it, and I will do a bit to improve the obvious notability of this major freight transportation services company, with $1.6 billion in revenue.Steven Russell 01:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Please read the link I provided in my deletion summary. If you do, you would understand why I deleted. And I advise you to use a bit more politer tone, as demands like this made me question my involvement here, as well as recreating it from scratch. Thank you, Steven. Maxim(talk) 23:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep it up Maxim! We all believe in you. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 23:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. :D Maxim(talk) 23:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Sorry mate, I would, but I have to run. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 00:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Once again, sorry I couldn't do this. I had to a school thing (not an exam, but similar), so it took priority! If you need help in the future, though, give me a yell, chances are I'll be able to help out. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 07:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Melt the clouds of sin and sadness...

Marlith T/C has wished you well! Joy promotes WikiLove and hopefully this little bit has helped make your day better. Spread the WikiJoy by sharing the joy someone else, Try to brighten the day of as many people as you can! Keep up the great editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Joy message}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Marlith T/C 04:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for September 10th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 37 10 September 2007 About the Signpost
From the editor: Interview with Jimbo Wales
An interview with Jimbo Wales WikiWorld comic: "Godwin's Law"
News and notes: 2,000,000, Finnish ArbCom, statistics, milestones Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 20:37, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


[edit] User:Carlstar3 on Sanjay Gupta

User:Carlstar3 resumed deletion of info following expiration of your protection of Sanjay Gupta. User did not take the time to engage in productive discussion on the talk page. I reported user here. Ripe 23:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My request for adminship

Hey thanks for your support, but more than that thanks for giving a fair review and trusting your instints we need more users like you here, take care. - Caribbean~H.Q. 00:29, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dear Maxim

I told you that sorrow would fade, friend,
And you would forget half your pain;
That the sweet bird of song would waken ere long,
And sing in your bosom again;
That hope would creep out of the shadows,
And back to its nest in your heart,
And gladness would come, and find its old home,
And that sorrow at length would depart.

I told you that grief seldom killed, friend,
Though the heart might seem dead for awhile.
But the world is so bright, and full of warm light
That 'twould waken at length, in its smile.
Ah, friend! was I not a true prophet?
There's a sweet happy smile on your face;
Your sadness has flown - the snow-drift is gone,
And the buttercups bloom in its place.

Ella Wheeler Wilcox

Missing your dear presence over here,
and hoping this is just a short resting time until you return to us, my friend,
With love,
Phaedriel
22:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Out-of-process deletions

Please elaborate where and when this redirect (or the content of the article it links to) was nominated for deletion. Thanks, Ghirla-трёп- 23:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Care to sift over the deletion log, by chance? Maxim(talk) 00:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Care to compare the content of what was nominated for deletion and what was deleted by you? --Ghirla-трёп- 00:10, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

You are very welcome to demonstrate that I was "abusing my edit rights and should be banned off the project".[2] I, for my own part, will appreciate if you refer me to the process by which you have received the tools. I see that you have been editing for several months already but I can see your name neither in the user rights log or user rename log. Thanks, Ghirla-трёп- 06:15, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My RfA

Thanks for supporting my recent successful RfA. It was flattering to read that you were considering nominating me - I'm honoured! Unfortunately, you won't see any RFCN reports from me any more ;) . Feel free to let me know if I do something incorrectly. Cheers! -- Flyguy649 talk contribs 03:46, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Email

You've got mail. :P Vassyana 07:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Feel free to disregard it. Vassyana 12:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Al-insan al-kamil

It has been protected for months now. Are you ever going to unprotect it? You can't just lock an article and leave it like that. — EliasAlucard|Talk 12:05 13 Sept, 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Yay!

Yay! Thank you for brightening my day up with the wonderful news, my friend! :) And please, don't mention it - you deserve a thousand poems, not just one ;) Too bad I was offline when you told me about the size of CSD... but I promise I'll join you in the crusade next time (after I clear the backlog of Now on Commons pics ! ;) Lots of love, and take good care, Phaedriel - 11:56, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hi

Hi, i have a quick question, i do not understand why this page was deleted. I would appreciate if you would explain it to me. Thank you. Tiptoety 18:25, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Basic housekeeping. User:Miranda specified it was already transcluded, I believe, so it was simply unneeded. Maxim(talk) 20:11, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Trophy FLCs

Thanks for your comments on my talk page. I am happy to review any list you want me to - I'll get on that right away. But could you do me a favor? I nominated List of tallest buildings in Miami a few days ago, and so far it has not barely received any feedback, so if you have time would mind reviewing it? Thanks, Rai-me 00:11, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your review! Rai-me 02:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RFA Thanks

Click there to open your card! → → →