Talk:Maxed Out

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale.

[edit] Unbalanced

The lack of critical coverage and in both the article and the chosen sources (which seem to be selected for their positive slant) gives the article the impression of an advertisement. That the article tends to detail accomplishments and publication/distribution minutiae in the lead does not help the matter, either. Granted, I removed the one link that was in any way critical, but a user had been mass-linking to the blog, which doesn't seem incredibly prominent. Dancter 15:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

There's nothing unbalanced, its just basic facts about the film. Daimerej (talk) 17:39, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

I agree with Daimerej. Its not the filmmakers fault that there was no "critical coverage" about the film. I read the article first,then saw the film,and I think this article is just basic facts about the film.--BeckiGreen (talk) 21:06, 9 June 2008 (UTC)