Talk:Maurice Saatchi, Baron Saatchi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage.

The form "Lord Saatchi" appears to be more common on the internet. So I will be moving this to Maurice Saatchi, Baron Saatchi, in accordance with the life peer naming conventions. -- Emsworth 22:14, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Why does this have such a strange title? SlimVirgin ^(talk) 20:11, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

From WP:NCNT:

Life peers (ie, people who have peerages awarded exclusively for their lifetime but who neither inherit it nor pass it on to anyone else) use the same standard as for hereditary peers: use the dignity in the title, unless the individual is exclusively referred to by personal name. For example: Quintin Hogg, Baron Hailsham of St Marylebone (not "Quintin McGarel Hogg"), but Margaret Thatcher (not "Margaret Thatcher, Baroness Thatcher.")

The question is: is he ever referred to as "Baron Saatchi"? I have no idea, but if so, the title complies with WP conventions, if not, it should be moved to Maurice Saatchi --Storkk 00:46, 7 July 2007 (UTC)