Talk:Maureen O'Gara

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 17 August 2007. The result of the discussion was redirect to Groklaw.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

[edit] Please elaborate

"O'Gara is known for her vehement criticism of the GPL" - please inform the reader what this criticism consists of. Shinobu 15:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] BLP

This is basically an attack article re-airing all of Groknews' claims against this reporter. I've commented out the apparent violations of WP:BLP, and they will be removed entirely if not cited in reliable secondary sources. Cool Hand Luke 22:41, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

The article as a whole seems to violate WP:BLP; does the subject even meet WP:BIO? She wrote for a non-notable defunct magazine run by a red-linked company, and now self-publishes non-notable newsletters. Generally, non-notable people involved in marginally notable controversies get mentioned, if at all, on a page related to the controversy. I've prodded--obviously, feel free to remove the prod if you disagree. THF 23:50, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
I think she could be on the cusp of notability. Although nearly all third-party references to her are in relation to the Groklaw tiff, she was apparently one of the first writers on Unix news, such as it is. I wouldn't be too surprised if a reliable source somewhere chronicles her days writing Unigram.X and so forth.
I have no problem, however, if this attack page is deleted. Cool Hand Luke 04:22, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] POV

This information is useful in trying to decode a (tiny) chapter in history. Couldn't we provide true biographical information about this persons career & journalistic successes, such that the Groklaw-feud is put into context? I'd hate to see the article deleted when it is an interesting and notable counterpoint to a chapter of computing history. However, I don't think it's fair to O'Gara to be so one-sided. So, yeah, if nothing changes I agree with BLP (at least condense the material & merge w/PJ or Groklaw) as above, but... the article is already here. It's an opportunity; why waste it, outright? 65.112.197.16 00:49, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

First see WP:BIO and especially WP:BLP1E. If you think she is really notable outside of this one event, feel free to find sources to back it up. Cool Hand Luke 04:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)