User talk:Matthewdkaufman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Yo

Welcome!

Hello, Matthewdkaufman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Karmafist 21:56, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:3ad-radioman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:3ad-radioman.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:04, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Traficantmug.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Traficantmug.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:09, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --digital_me(t/c) 20:15, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:3ad_recruit_1955.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:3ad_recruit_1955.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:31, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Chineseguncrew.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Chineseguncrew.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 00:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Daybydaycartoon.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Daybydaycartoon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Traficantmug.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Traficantmug.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 11:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Traficantmug.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Traficantmug.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 11:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Alanbradytoupee.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Alanbradytoupee.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Festertoupee.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Festertoupee.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:07, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Alanbradytoupee.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Alanbradytoupee.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. βcommand 21:57, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Alanbradytoupee.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Alanbradytoupee.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mr.Z-man 21:01, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 3AD

Greetings! Just a comment about your edits to 3d Armored Division: When I was in the division back in the 80s, both the motto and the nickname were pretty much universal among not only the folks in my unit, but division-wide(as far as I could discern). I would like to hear from you on this-please give me a buzz.--Lyricmac 13:51, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Once again, please give me buzz regarding your edits to 3d Armored Division. Thanks.--Lyricmac (talk) 03:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

My friend, I have tried to contact you regarding your edits to 3d Armored Division without success. Accordingly, I am reverting your last edit to this article, save that I will be deleting the mottoes, both official and unofficial, as they are rather extraneous. If you wish to write me later about this, I will be glad to discuss this with you. The last thing in which I am interested is an edit war. Wishing you the best of the day, --Lyricmac (talk) 15:42, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Lyric: I was in the 2/3FA, 1st BDE 3AD from 85-88 and never heard the unofficial motto, nor really ever heard "3rd Herd" used much (I can count on one hand the # of times I recall hearing it. This might be because up at the Rock we didn't see much of the rest of the Division. We called the Division "3rd AD" , if we every referred to it, or more likely as, "The Fucking 3rd AD". Referring to the Division as "Third Herd" almost every singly time in the Gulf War section doesn't make much sense to me, given that its NOT referred to in that way anywhere else. I will copy this on your page, to see what you think, but I'll tell ya, "Third Herd" used a couple of times is fine, but over and over? I'll bet you that the 3rd ID has the same internal nickname. No need to use it in the article as synonym for the Division. --199.68.81.105 (talk) 19:50, 17 December 2007 (UTC)



Excuse me, are you Matthewdkaufman, or are you 199.68.81.105? With whom am I speaking? I would very much appreciate some clarity here. Why are you using two accounts?

In any case, (1), if you will re-read the article, beginning with the Cold War section and continuing to the end, you will find that the term Third Herd is used a total of five times in all that span. I didn't count the times that the terms, 3rd AD, the division, 3AD, or 3rd Armored Division were used; suffice to say that they greatly outnumbered the Third Herd term and thus. This, in my opinion, doesn't constitute "over and over". The purpose of integrating different titles is to inculcate a bit of variety into the narrative and to make it more interesting, provided that the title is a valid one. (2) I traveled extensively over 3AD country in my time there and invariable heard soldiers using it wherever I went. I also heard my compatriots use the terms 3AD, the Division, Spearhead and 3rd AD. True, I heard it less in Frankfurt(Drake Kaserne, where I was assigned) than at other places such as G'hausen and Hanau. However it seemed that the common soldier used the 'herd' title as much as the others, maybe simply because it was different. (3) The title or term Third Herd is one that I also heard on a subsequent tour to 1st Armored Division when it was headquartered at Ansbach, only this time to describe the 3d ACR at Hof, on the Czech border. I had mentioned that to a couple of fellows I knew up at Hof, when I was TDY there, antd they confirmed that 3d ACR had been referred to in that manner since Vietnam(at least), and that they had also heard the 3AD reference, as well. (4) Neither I nor my still-active contacts ever heard 3d ID referred to as Third Herd, I think, simply because it would seem strange to hear an infantry division referred thus, unless it is a light division, or mobile. Even then the term "herd" scares up an image of tanks or cavalry.

As I had stated previously, the mottoes, both official and otherwise, I deleted in keeping with the apparent practice in other articles of this type, so I think that this is a non-issue.

I hope that this "tome" suffices as a justification for the use of the term Third Herd in the article. There is nothing more that I can add. Wishing you the best of the day,--Lyricmac (talk) 21:53, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Comments to Lyric's message:

Excuse me, are you Matthewdkaufman, or are you 199.68.81.105? With whom am I speaking? I would very much appreciate some clarity here. Why are you using two accounts? ---Pure Laziness on my account, sorry.

In any case, (1), if you will re-read the article, beginning with the Cold War section and continuing to the end, you will find that the term Third Herd is used a total of five times in all that span. I didn't count the times that the terms, 3rd AD, the division, 3AD, or 3rd Armored Division were used; suffice to say that they greatly outnumbered the Third Herd term and thus. This, in my opinion, doesn't constitute "over and over". The purpose of integrating different titles is to inculcate a bit of variety into the narrative and to make it more interesting, provided that the title is a valid one.

--I disagree. The article is written for, and ready by, a general audience. "Third Herd" just isn't a recognized name for the unit anywhere I've ever seen it referred to, in all the books I've read and all the Websites out there devoted to it. Try this: Google "Third Herd" and you'll find more refernces to an Air Force unit, and the 3rd ACR than you will to the 3rd AD. "Third Herd" just doesn't deserve to be a synonym for the 3rd AD like "The Big Red One" or "The Black Sheep". Also, "Third Herd" is used primarily in the Gulf War section, and virtually nowhere else.

(2) I traveled extensively over 3AD country in my time there and invariable heard soldiers using it wherever I went.  I also heard my compatriots use the terms 3AD, the Division, Spearhead and 3rd AD.  True, I heard it less in Frankfurt(Drake Kaserne, where I was assigned) than at other places such as G'hausen and Hanau. However it seemed that the common soldier used the 'herd' title as much as the others, maybe simply because it was different.

--At the Rock, 1st BDE, I don't recall ever hearing it, and I was there for 2.5 years from 85-88. We were pretty isolated, except for travels to exotic Grafonweohr, Hohenfels and Wildflicken.

(3) The title or term Third Herd is one that I also heard on a subsequent tour to 1st Armored Division when it was headquartered at Ansbach, only this time to describe the 3d ACR at Hof, on the Czech border. I had mentioned that to a couple of fellows I knew up at Hof, when I was TDY there, antd they confirmed that 3d ACR had been referred to in that manner since Vietnam(at least), and that they had also heard the 3AD reference, as well.

(4) Neither I nor my still-active contacts ever heard 3d ID referred to as Third Herd, I think, simply because it would seem strange to hear an infantry division referred thus, unless it is a light division, or mobile. Even then the term "herd" scares up an image of tanks or cavalry.

--Moot then. But the 3rd ACR reference in point 3 shows that "Herd" isn't a specific nickname for the 3rd AD.


Then, if it is that important to you, by all means revert the 'third herd' references to other titles and thats okay with me. That will be my last word on the subject. Kindest regards--Lyricmac (talk) 01:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sgtrock04.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sgtrock04.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Ralph Wiggum. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. MacAddct  1984 (talk • contribs) 00:42, 10 March 2008 (UTC) "Mac" - You apparently condoned using the word "retard" as a pejorative for months. Why wasn't THAT removed?

I've been working with the developmentally disabled for almost 2 years now. I don't particularly like the term "retard", but I don't think the poster meant it maliciously and Wikipedia does not censor. However, when it turns into personal attacks, it's best the conversation gets finished. -- MacAddct  1984 (talk • contribs) 14:16, 11 March 2008 (UTC)