User talk:MatthewJS

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Carl Rogers

I believe you have done a great job with this page!!!!!! I just noticed a few grammatical errors, which I saw you reverted :(. I switched back and am leaving an explanation that I placed on my edits. I hope you will let them pass because they are so minor to an excellent page. I am an avid Rogerian reader myself - I am in the process of reading On Becoming a Person as we speak. This page is well-done in fact better than what I have seen in my other favorites - Maslow, Fromm,etc. - as you can see I am big on humanistic psychology and existentialism. ForrestLane42 00:24, 5 January 2007 (UTC)ForrestLane42

[edit] A WikiProject you may be interested in...

Hi there! I notice you're from Surrey - please take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Surrey, which I started earlier this afternoon. Cheers.--Vox Humana 8' 21:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] UK Mensa?

Hello- as a member of the UK branch of Mensa, do you have access to archived copies of Mensa Magazine? If so, there's a favor I have to ask. johnpseudo 17:04, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Faansie2007.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Faansie2007.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:33, 26 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Martha Lane Fox.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Martha Lane Fox.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:57, 7 November 2007 (UTC)