User talk:Mathieu66

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The article PEtALS has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. [1]

The article PEtALS ESB has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

The article ObjectWeb Petals has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

The article OW2 Petals has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

You have recently recreated or reposted material at PEtALS which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this page without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the page's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. --Hu12 (talk) 19:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] http://spam.petals.objectweb.org

Accounts

Jplorre (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • what links to user page • count COIBot • search an, ani, cn, an3 • user page logs • x-wiki • status • LinkWatcher search • Google)
Mathieu66 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • what links to user page • count COIBot • search an, ani, cn, an3 • user page logs • x-wiki • status • LinkWatcher search • Google)
--Hu12 (talk) 19:25, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

It has become apparent that your account is only being used for spamming inappropriate external links or self-promotion, so it has been blocked indefinitely. Wikipedia is NOT a "repository of links" or a "vehicle for advertising" and persistent spammers will also have their websites blacklisted.

--Hu12 (talk) 19:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Hu12. I am quite sorry with what's considered as "spam" there. The article was deleted, the I rewrote it (i supposed) in a better way. I don't see why PEtALS article is considered as "spam", I read the "spam" topic carefully but I still don't get it... Could you explain please ?

PEtALS is an open source project, as other projects [2]I don't see why it shouldn't be in the "product" category, along with other similar softwares...

--Mathieu66 (talk) 13:03, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Also, I separated "products" links from other links, in [3] because every links were mixed and it was messy. You deleted then the whole "product links" category, which I did not dare do myself, but was right. I hope you did not consider that was spam...

--Mathieu66 (talk) 13:10, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I suppose the page did not include 2nd source references to prove it is noteable. If this is not the problem, please tell me what it is. If it is, then could we think about putting the webpage back, then I correct it ?

Also, I just saw Jplorre (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • what links to user page • count COIBot • search an, ani, cn, an3 • user page logs • x-wiki • status • LinkWatcher search • Google) had a warning before deleting his previous PEtALS article. I was not myself warned for my own article, and did not know Jplorre (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • what links to user page • count COIBot • search an, ani, cn, an3 • user page logs • x-wiki • status • LinkWatcher search • Google) wrote one before.

Please respond...

--Mathieu66 (talk) 08:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)