User:Mattisse//myBox3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


PPLEASE DO NOT ALLOWW JEFFERSON ANDERSON TO DELETE ANY OF MY PAGES]

This constant harrassment isn't letting up. Should I complain somewhere? It now takes up a good part of my day. Today's reverting and removal of a few unsourced tags prompted me to as this question:

  • [1]] where I was told removing tags can be consider vandalizm. I followed the advice and left polite notes, and it just got worse with more people involved.

Old stuff:

  • [2] Sock puppet/Mattisse(2nd)
  • [3] Sock puppett/Mattisse(3rd}
  • [4]Recent Incident on removing Sock puppet tag
  • [5] User:BostonMA

Newer stuff:

These are just the few I have seen. User:Netsnipe at one point left notes around telling them to use Checkuser. As did User talk:JzG I have now found out. Both are Admins. Nothing works. Mattisse(talk) 21:16, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Do be aware that this is not the first time Mattisse has gone on a tagging spree. The first time she tagged every article listed in Starwood Festival. She then created multiple sockpuppets to continue tagging the same set of articles. Several of us suspect that Timmy12 is a sockpuppet being used by Mattisse to do such tagging now. Ekajati (yakity-yak) 19:23, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

No, that whole list of restrictions, etc. on checkuser is completely intimidating. I would prefer if this came to the attention of an admin who could file the checkuser. I noticed that Hanuman Das tried to open a sockpuppetry case on it Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mattisse (3rd) but got shot down, even though there are two similar earlier complaints that got confirmed: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mattisse & Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mattisse (2nd). Ekajati (yakity-yak) 19:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
There was a Sockpuppet check which was closed as not similar enough to demonstrate a sockpuppet relationship. --Salix alba (talk) 20:17, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Yes, AFAIK, a checkuser has never been done. After reading all the restrictions on the use of checkuser, I prefer for an admin to file the request. The users in question seem to think that my pointing out the similarity of pattern between the two users modus operandi plus the overlap in the articles targeted is harrassment. Can an admin please follow up on doing a checkuser and/or looking into this further? Ekajati (yakity-yak) 21:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] So, would you say . . .

Does Robert Johnson deserve a tag for not citing sources? Seems like the person who admitted the article was not sourced on my talk page is the one who removed the tag.

See:[10] Mattisse(talk) 21:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I believe the article deserves the tag. Because Aguerriero understands that he was mistaken, I don't believe he'll remove the tag again. There shouldn't be any further problem and hopefully someone will step up to the plate and cite the sources. TomTheHand 22:24, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks! Mattisse(talk) 22:32, 23 October 2006 (UTC)


  • /more box