User:Mattisse/

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  • old list from user page [1]

Jefferson Anderson (or new incarnate), please do no delete material from my user page again.]




  • December 14 Addhoc to AMA re me [2]
  • December 13 Me to Addhoc (Advocate) [3]
  • December 12 Ekajati acuuses me of "outing" him [4]
  • December 10 Ars Scriptor's last day [5]
  • December 8 Ars Scriptor to AddHoc [6]
  • December 8 Ars Scriptor to me [7]
  • December 8 Ars Scriptor to me [8]
  • December 8 Ars Scriptor to me [9]
  • December 8 Ars Scriptor to me [10]
  • December 7 Ars Scriptor to User:Morven [11]
  • December 7 Ars Scriptor to me [12]
  • December 7 Ars Scriptor to himself about me [13]
  • December 7 Ars Scriptor to Netsnipe about Flinders [14]
  • December 7 Ars Scripor files ANI "Mattisse Redux" [15]
  • December 7 Ars Scriptor to CheNuevara about Flinders [16]
  • December 5 on my talk page [17]
  • Novermber 30 (Che defends me against 999 on Andrew Cohen talk) [18]
  • November 29 on Mediation Cabal page re Geo signature [19]
  • November 29 to Geo asking him to change his signiture [20]
  • October 25 to Ekajaki re CheckUser [21]
  • October 25 on ANI added snotty evidence re Timmy12 (defending Hanaman Das & Ekajaki [22]
  • October 25 add evidence to Request for Checkuser/Mattisse [23]
  • October 24 snotty reply to ANI "Removing tags without fixing problem" [24]
  • October 23 to Ekajaki - looking into Mattisse [25]
  • October 23 to Rdsmith4 re Mattisse from User:Aguerriero (who became User:Ars Scriptor) [26]
  • October 23 to Ekajaki - Mattisse/Timmy12/CheckUser [27]
  • October 23 to Ekajaki - Mattisse/Timmy12/CheckUser [28]
  • October 23 on Mattisse's page after TomTheHand - stands corrected [29]
  • October 23 on Mattisse's page to TomTheHand anwser hmm... [30]
  • October 23 removed Citation template from Robert Johnson [31]
  • October 23 to Mattisse about Robert Johnson template [32]

Contents

[edit] Other

  • December 10 Rosencomet (within minutes)
  1. to 999[33]and
  2. to User:CheNuevara[34]
  3. to Ars Scriptor [35]
  4. to Ekajati[36]
  5. to Salix Aba[37]

Jefferson Anderson (or new incarnate), please do no delete material from my user page again.]


Jefferson Anderson (or new incarnate), please do no delete material from my user page again.]

October 27, 2006 - ANI's

[41]

[edit] Two

  • [42]#110 Puppetmaster Mattisse repeatedly removing puppetmaster tag

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive141- Archive 141


Jefferson Anderson (or new incarnate), please do no delete material from my user page again.]

I noticed one of your comments that was mentioned in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Mattisse. Specifically this one. Just wanted to mention that London Time is not the same thing as GMT or UTC. In fact GMT and UTC aren't technically the same thing either but that's largely irrelevant. British time aka Western European Time has DST and therefore during summer months, they are UTC+1 (see British Summer Time). Nil Einne 06:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Three

-- Question about importance (October 24, 2006 -ANI) --


Jefferson Anderson (or new incarnate), please do no delete material from my user page again.]

An article Indian rock cut architecture, having inline citations from five different sources on the web, has been tagged unimportant for the following reason:

This looks like original research based on web-only sources. Aren't there any books or academic journals on the subject? If not, how is this important? Ekajati (yakity-yak) 15:48, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Is this a valid reason for tagging an article as unimportant? Mattisse(talk) 16:06, 24 October 2006 (UTC)


Jefferson Anderson (or new incarnate), please do no delete material from my user page again.]

I think this shows signs of actions specifically directed at one user. User:Ekajati and User:Hanuman Das seem to be following User:Mattisse around, tagging articles User:Mattisse has worked on, reverting tags which M has added, and generally trying to stir up problems (see User talk:Aguerriero). This is linked to past tagging by M on articles HD worked on and lots of sockpuppet acusations. It seems to me they are on the wrong side WP:POINT and WP:AGF. --Salix alba (talk) 16:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
You've got that backwards. It has been Mattisse stalking first Rosencomet, then 999, then Hanuman Das and to some extent myself. She used sockpuppets to stalk Rosencomet and 999, and is probably using Timmy12 now to continue to stalk Rosencomet. How long will the admins let this continue? I've put many of the involved article on my watchlist so can see the patterns. Have you looked? Ekajati (yakity-yak) 16:49, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
That is a past event which has been resolved with administrator intervention. We are now talking about current events such as [45], [46], removing/moving citation tags on various blues artist. Basically anything Matisse edits seems to have Ekajati quickly doing a dimetrically opposite edit. Comparing contributions for Mattise [47] and Ekajati [48] show remarkable similarity. --Salix alba (talk) 17:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't believe it is over. Check out these edits by Timmy12:

Ekajati (yakity-yak) 20:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

--Netsnipe Rosencomet--


Jefferson Anderson (or new incarnate), please do no delete material from my user page again.]

  • Rosencomet has a long justification for why he is not who he is.

Rosencomet.com

[50] Brihadeshvara Temple

* Incident #79 October 27, 2006 [[User:Mattisse [52] on User talk:CBDunkerson from User talk:Salix alba


[edit] ANBI

October 27, 2006

1*Question about importance

2*Rverting or removing tags without fixing problem

3*.22Citation Needed.22 in John Lee Hooker

4*Request for assistance

5*Stalking.2C vandalism.2C.possible_sockpuppetry_evasion_of_block_by_Timmy12

6*Harassment Hanuman Das and User:Ekajati

7*Vandalism warning question

8*Vandalism warning question -- again.21

9*User Mattisse


[edit] Else

From: rosencomet.com on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam

[59], sock 3
[60] Check User
[61] Admin Incident

Question (to Netsnipe}

/olden days

[edit] Help

[edit] Trying to figure something out

(to User talk:Rdsmith4 [62])

I am hoping you will help me here and provide me with reality. I know this is a big thing to ask of you and if you do not want to, I understand. I am asking you because you are quoted and I cannot find the checkuser.

This is said to be the case regarding me:

(quote) Rdsmith4 (talk • contribs) ran the CheckUser. --  Netsnipe  ►  15:49, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

The filings I am aware of:

  1. Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Listerin Filed July 26
  2. Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mattisse filed September 6
  3. Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mattisse (2nd) filed September 6
  4. Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mattisse (3rd)- filed September 21
  5. Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mattisse filed October 25
  6. Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mattisse (4th)
  7. [63]Requests for checkuser - Listerin provided by Hanuman Das.

There has also been:

Could you show me where that all CheckUsers are so that I may fully disclose in all cases and not have to speculate and sound wishy-washy? I looked for yours but could not find it.

A new mediator on the Starwood case filed this ANI on me "Mattisse Redux" on December 7 because I unsatisfactorily tried to answer a question about those sockpuppets: [64]

Since these accusations are pursuing me to this day I wish to know which are sockpuppets of mine so I may answer honestly what has been proven as fact. One came up a few days ago: User:LiftWaffen.[65] Is that a sockpuppet if mine? I don't want to take up your time and energy or bother you. If there is another way of going about this, please advise me. Thank you. Sincerely, Mattisse 16:49, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Also there is a proposed Arbitration case Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Starwood/ACE et al. links but I think I am peripheral to this although I never can tell as the sockpuppet accusations have come up there also. But I've learned to use diffs and others things through all of this - I'm not so helpless anymore. My edit history is really very good 14,000 edits and working on a FA candidate Hoysala empire. Sincerely, Mattisse 16:49, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 01-12-2006

(unindent} Jefferson Anderson shows up on my talk page on January 12, having had no interactions with me before and posts the following many posts all on that day, then lists me as a rude editor on his user page along with a Mattisse sockpuppet box. January 12 sequential diffs:

  • My edit [66]
  • JA (his first edit on my page but he copied something above that I did not write [67]
  • JA post #2 [68]
  • JA post #3 [69]
  • JA [70]
  • JA[71]
  • JA after my apology [72]
  • I copy my replies from his page to mine [73]
  • JA [74]
  • JA [75]
  • I apologise again [76]
  • and again [77]
  • JA [78]
  • JA [79]
  • JA [80]
  • JA puts list of rude editors on his page[81]
  • JA[82]
  • JA[83]
  • another user advises him [84]
  • JA puts Mattisse sockpuppet tag on his user page[85]
  • someone else removes template [86]

The last edit summary I made asking him not to post on my page again has been used repeadedly since as an example of my harrassment of him. On January 18 he posts on my talk page again: [87] I am suspicious of him now because he posted on my page repeatedly without knowing me, his subject was sockpuppet (known preocupation of Hanuman Das and Ekajaki), he was overly invested in me as shown by his posts, after I apologised deeply three times, he listed me as a rude editor and posted the Mattisse sockpuppet box on his user page. Why would a disinterested user invest so much time in me? Sincerely, Mattisse 15:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Articles