Talk:Matthew Rush (porn star)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

	LGBT Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 June 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

Contents 1 Remove "HIV-positive" in "See also" 2 Matthew Rush (porn star) is vanity 3 Requested move 4 Article needs work!

[edit] Remove "HIV-positive" in "See also"

I feel that the link to 'List of HIV-positive' page in the See Also section should be removied. Neither page says that Matthew Rush is HIV-positive and such a link is misleading and damaging to the gay community.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.42.166.83 19:48, 9 December 2005 (talk • contribs)

[edit] Matthew Rush (porn star) is vanity

The article on Matthew Rush (porn star) is vanity and, as such, should be deleted. -- W L Overal

• Matthew Rush is a prominent gay porn star, and therefore a worthy subject of a Wikipedia article. Wikipedia has hundreds of articles about porn stars, most of whom are less notable than Matthew Rush. If the article requires editing to remove vanity, then do so. The presence of a few sentences that are POV in an article does not make it a candidate for deletion. Nominating an article on that basis would be a bad faith nomination. Zeromacnoo 12:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Requested move

There is no need for the "(porn star)" designation; no other article exists with the same name. ([[Matthew Rush]] is currently a redirect page.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chidom (talk • contribs) (yep, 'twas I. I've suddenly stopped remembering to sign things. Ah, age.)—Chidom ^talk  03:59, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Page moved, per request - no need for disambiguation. -GTBacchus^(talk) 03:33, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!—Chidom ^talk  03:59, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Article needs work!

• This article has 2 great expernal links which have more and very interesting info not included in this article. These links are also not referenced at all! In fact the only citation is this article is the very unreliable IMDB which does not include a bio on the subject or anything. For a subject clearlying having good references we should do a re-write on this and make it a more exciting and readable + well-cited article! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robin Redford (talk • contribs) 19:19, 22 September 2007 (UTC)