From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Brettingham as architect of Holkham Hall, and lack of many references
When creating this article it was my intention to publicise, a notable, but little known (outside of England) architect. I believe at present (January 2005) this may be the longest internet article on him. A google search reveals many hits, but most sites contain only a few lines concerning him, and much of the information contained there is contradictory. Hence for this article I have attempted to use only reliable authentic written works, however even here dates can differ, largely because the date an architect designed a building, the date building work commenced, and finished can be open to interpretation. Researching this article I bought the only book for sale on the internet which had Matthew Brettingham in its title, (Howell, D (1964). "Matthew Brettingham and the County of Norfolk". Norfolk Archaeology 33, Part III.) while of some help, it is concerned chiefly with the court case over Norwich Shirehall, which is irelevant to his career, and a few facts concerning his early career. The book begins "Matthew Brettingham is a man about whom legends grow", and concludes Robert Adam exaggerated claims about Brettingham, but the book does nothing to dispel or prove either myths or exaggerations. Thus in this article I have confined myself to what is definitely known, or certainly supported by an authoritative source.
One of many the many myths surrounding Brettingham, promoted on the internet, and in some books is that he was the architect of Holkham Hall. He was not. One such site, containing false information [1] dismisses William Kent altogether and in the same page attributes Holkham Hall to Brettingham and Burlington, and then under the caption introduces Colen Campbell another architect who published plans of various houses but was unconnected with Holkham Hall in any other way. Brettingham was an architect employed by Lord Leicester to oversee the building of the project as Clerk of Works. He could possibly be called the "Executive architect" today, but there is no evidence that he altered Kent's and Burlington's plans, certainly they were absentee architects, and Brettingham probably interpreted the plans, and corrected minor faults, he may even have even altered room layouts etc., but it is only "may have" and "probable". All reliable sources credit the design to Kent and Burlington, and many sources (including Brettingham himself) credit Lord Leicester with a large architectural input. It should also be remembered that at the design stage of Holkham Hall, Brettingham was in an early stage in his career, it is unlikely that an unknown "local builder/surveyor", and former bricklayer, would have been permitted much architectural input when two such already illustrious architects were already employed on the design.
Brettingham was though even in the 18th century referred to as "Lord Leicester's architect" (or surveyor which was the commonly used word then), and indeed he was certainly an architect retained by Leicester and "probably" carried out other estate designs for him. He certainly obtained the commission at Kedleston because of his work at Holkham Hall so it is likely even then he was thought of as the architect of Holkham Hall.
It may be that hard reliable evidence proving a real architectural input exists in the Holkham archives, or in a reference book, or even the internet and will come to light in the future - but at the moment either I can't find it or it does not exist.. Thus without concrete evidence while it is accepted his input at Holkham Hall was huge, it must be assumed it was in the capacity of Clerk of Works which was his job description there. Giano 16:47, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
