Talk:Matt Entenza
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
||
[edit] Vandalism
There have been a number of edits recently by an anonymous user. These edits have change the article content slightly to support a position critical of Entenza. I feel that the content of the Star Tribune article linked to is accuratly summed up by the current edit. Inserting statements beyond what is in the cited story is outside the scope of this article and probably violates the NPOV policy. (User 70.57.147.253, you make a lot of edits. Why don't you create an account?) --Nscheibel 18:28, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Also, an anonymous user from 63.224.4.x has been removing all content relating to Entenza's withdrawal from the AG race. --Nscheibel 13:46, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Geeze, call the Wikipedia police. Get over it
Do you have their number? 911 didn't seem to know. --Nscheibel 15:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
I agree with Nscheibel. This article sucks as it is sooo unbalanced it clearly violates NPOV! I know this guy & IT DOES NOT PROPERLY REFLECT HIM AT ALL. I would think that if you are going to profile a LAWYER you should be careful what you write...and consequently Wikipedia should either fix it or pull it. Contrary to the assertion in the article about DFLers among his detractors...WE LOVE HIM!!!71.82.119.90 23:46, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] NPOV
Just about this entire article is muckraking. I'm all for muckraking but there's no balance here - one law credited to him and then into the dirt. I think there needs to be some balance; right now it's almost entirely scandals. I don't know the guy but on a casual visit, trying to learn about him, I was disappointed both in not finding much of what I need to know, and in the balance of this article. Given the remainder of this talk page I guess I shouldn't be surprised. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.172.23.24 (talk) 16:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC).
Matt Entenza should feel lucky this is all that's written about him. He is the most unethical DFLer this party has seen in a long time. The Democrats should wash their hands of him.
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:MattEn.jpg
Image:MattEn.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
