Talk:Matrix theory/Comments

Needs history, motivation, much more on applications, oeverveiw fo theroems linked to in "See also"... Tompw 14:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
With the current content (essentially a subset of Matrix(mathematics)) the article is more of a stub than a "start". In addition, at least the current content fails to clarify why an article separate from Matrix(mathematics) and linear algebra is needed for "Matrix theory". If the article contributors disagree and have in mind High/Top-importance content which is not naturally treated under the aforesaid articles (as well in individual articles on topics such as Cayley-Hamilton theorem), please do revert my change. However, if no such topics emerge, I would suggest merging this with Matrix. Stca74 16:37, 14 June 2007 (UTC)