Talk:Matlock, Derbyshire
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] 1
Would it not be better to separate Matlock and Matlock Bath into different articles? (Our Phellap 00:21, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC))
[edit] 2
Need to back up claim that Matlock has a growing reputation for the Arts if the claim is to be credible - otherwise the statement is just opinion.
This should be named "Matlock, England". "Matlock" should be the "Matlock (disambiguation)" article.--Will 17:20, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Matlock does have a growing reputation for arts! Highfields (talk) (contribs) 14:31, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 3
Whats with the reference to "Matlock Bridge" as a part of Matlock?
When I lived there (18 years) everyone called it "Matlock" - it does have the town centre in it anyway.
BTW The major employer is the county council on Smedley Street.
- The railway station was called "Matlock Bridge" when it opened. Chevin 08:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
--JeremyBoden 01:50, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Whell I live there and Matlock Town, Matlock Bridge, and Matlock Green are all districts of the same town, however Matlock Bath is a seperate town... Highfields (talk) (contribs) 09:29, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sheffield City region
Is this really true? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 666ph666 (talk • contribs) 07:58, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
I have live here for the last 14 years and I've never heard anything about it. Highfields (talk) (contribs) 19:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Highfields School
Would it be a good idea to create a seperate article for Highfields School? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 666ph666 (talk • contribs) 08:05, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- I agree; it seems to be one of few secondary schools in Derbyshire not to have its own article. Rachel Pearce 11:57, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- It has one (Highfields School) 82.27.31.211 18:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
-
- So it has. Funny, when I searched for it the other day I just kept getting linked back to this article. Rachel Pearce 20:33, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- It's new. I created it on Monday. Highfields (talk) (contribs) 18:05, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Matlocklivelogo.gif
Image:Matlocklivelogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Matlocktowncouncillogo.jpg
Image:Matlocktowncouncillogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)