Talk:Mathew Chuk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was nominated for deletion on February 1, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on 31 December 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page is about an active politician who is running for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.
More information about this article... The following comments have been left for this page: More than a start, not a good article yet, so gets a B. -- Avi 18:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC) (edit)

Portal	Mathew Chuk is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
B	This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Assessment comments The following comments were left by the assessors: (edit · history · watch · refresh) More than a start, not a good article yet, so gets a B. -- Avi 18:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Article reads like POV isn't consistent or neutral. Lots of very emotive language used, especially when describing elections. Is is possible for someone to clean this up? 203.5.217.3 07:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

You need to review the NPOV policy. Emotive language does not necessarily constitute a POV violation in and of itself. 203.202.5.75 01:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm quite likely misstating my reasons, though I still feel that the article is unnecessarily flowery. Lines such as 'Battered by a tsunami of electoral discontent' aren't really encyclopaedic, and parts of the article feel like original research / opinion. 203.5.217.3 05:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

This is perhaps the most self-indulgent and unimportant articles to ever appear on this website. An article on the specific types of wildflowers in Luxemburg or the actor that played Prisoner #34 in The Green Mile would be a better use of internet space. This should be deleted, or at least rated "0" on the importance scale.

You're ignoring the significance on the basis of that impressive monobrow

Article is biased and uses overly emotive, heroic language describing his activities. Is the minutiae of high school life really relevant? Additionally, I know it's already been voted on, but I'm of the opinion this page shouldn't exist at all. Damian 07:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Photo

What sort of photo is that? is it trying to portray Chuk in a negative light? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Content Michellecrisp 11:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

no surprise the photo was added by an active member of a uni liberal club...given Chuk's views on the Howard Government. is there a conflict of interest here? Michellecrisp 11:58, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

I can't see anything negative about it personally, I thought it was quite a nice photo, just noticed that the photo was taken down and it was the only one I had. LibStu 00:44, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

This kind of comment just only serves to reflect your strong Liberal bias. The photo you put up was inappropriate for an encyclopaedia. Michellecrisp 01:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

strong mono brow —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.111.56.16 (talk) 02:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Guild politics is serious business... 202.168.97.143 (talk) 00:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)