Image:Matissedance.jpg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The Dance II" (1909) by Henri Matisse (1869-1954).Dimensions 260 x 391 cm (Hermitage version).

Fair use rationale in Henri Matisse:
  1. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
  2. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
  3. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
  4. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
  5. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.

Fair use rationale in The Dance (painting):

  1. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
  2. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
  3. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
  4. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
  5. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.

Fair use rationale in Fauvism:

  1. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
  2. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
  3. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
  4. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
  5. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.

Fair use rationale in History of painting:

  1. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
  2. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
  3. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
  4. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
  5. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.

Fair use rationale in Sergei Shchukin:

  1. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
  2. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
  3. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
  4. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
  5. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.

Fair use rationale in Western painting:

  1. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
  2. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
  3. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
  4. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
  5. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.

Fair use rationale in The Rite of Spring:

  1. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
  2. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
  3. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
  4. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
  5. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.

Fair use rationale in Late Modernism:

  1. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
  2. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
  3. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
  4. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
  5. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.

Fair use rationale in Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007:

  1. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
  2. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
  3. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
  4. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
  5. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.

[edit] Licensing

This image may be public domain in the United States, if it was published (not merely created) before 1923.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeDimensionsUserComment
current15:06, 25 December 2005370×243 (45 KB)Moltovivace (Talk | contribs) ("The Dance" by Henri Matisse (1910). Public Domain image.)

The following pages on the English Wikipedia link to this file (pages on other projects are not listed):

Metadata

This file contains additional information, probably added from the digital camera or scanner used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details may not fully reflect the modified file.