User talk:Mastiboy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Leave something if you don't like. --Mastiboy 17:04, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Thank you!

Mastiboy, thank you for your support. Trying to keep the Ahmadi articles pov free is for the most part a thankless job! It is heartening to realize that my effort is appreciated. Best reagrds Nazli 03:25, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Nice work and Best of Luck. --Mastiboy 03:30, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for this gift ... --Babbarshair 15:08, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Thanx for info, I already know about it. phippi46 15:27, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Thanks for what info? --Babbarshair 16:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] MIrza Ghulam Ahmad

Hi, Mastiboy, besides reverting my edits you have also reverted my spelling and pov corrections. I hope you will not report me for a vandalism/3R violation if I correct those. Thanks Nazli 14:05, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Sure, It was only for passages. --Mastiboy 14:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ubaidullah Sindhi

You might want to keep an eye on this article. An Ahmedi editors is constantly trying to prove that this anti-British wahhabi rebel was actually a pro-British Qadiani. Yes it sounds like a joke but the editor is persistantly coming up with manufactured referencesHassanfarooqi 17:32, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] About Mirza Ghulam

Please consider my points also and dont just slap at my face again and again with your cold reverts. I have added the most authentic references in the critics part. i.e. From Mirza's own authored books with proper page number references. VirtualEye 03:04, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

    • Thanks for your efforts regarding this article, but I must say here that existance of a fork doesn't mean that we eliminate the entire content from the main article. Mirza Ghulams's prophecies were a major area of criticism and it should be mentioned on the main page. I would suggest if you could compress things and present it there so that it would preserve the integrity of the article. Just deleting things is simply endorsing POV for this article. Thanks ... --Mastiboy 16:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)