User talk:Masterhomer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives: 1

[edit] Helping with Version 1.0 listing

Hi, thanks for your reply! Someone from the Judaism project has very kindly added some articles and assessments to the Judaism project table, you are most welcome to add a few more key articles. If you are interested in doing more, then perhaps you could see if others at the project would support using the assessment tags on talk pages? This approach is proving very popular because of the bot-generated tables and log, though among religious projects so far only Wikipedia:WikiProject_Catholicism is using it, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism/Assessment. Please let me know if I can help. Thanks, Walkerma 06:10, 19 August 2006 (UTC) Articles like Kibbutz probably belong with a listing for either WikiProject:Israel or an Israeli Regional Notice Board, whichever is the main coordinating body for articles on Israel. As yet we don't have a table set up for these, though we will get there eventually! Thanks, Walkerma 06:28, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Incomplete edit?

Hi, your recent edit in JFJ left the phrase these "indications" dangling out of context. Just FYI. Thanks. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 01:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Userboxes

Hi Masterhomer: FYI, the userbox you use, {{User WP Israel}}, now signifies participation in Wikipedia:WikiProject Israel. I took the liberty to change it to {{User Portal:Israel}}. It was I who made both decisions to name/rename, so I am the one to blame for the confusion. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 22:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Collaboration notices

Hi Masterhomer. Collaboration notices should go on the talk pages, not article pages. The expansion tag is for article space. Thanks. --Fang Aili ^talk 17:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Hmm.. well I notice that some of the collaboration articles do have tags in article space, some don't. And the instructions do say to put the notice on the talk pages. It seems weird to me to put a collaboration notice on an article, but maybe that's just me. At least, we shouldn't have both the collaboration and the expand tags there. Anyways, I won't argue with you about it. :) Good luck on the article. I tried to do a little internet research but there's not much there (about 160 unique G hits). Cheers, Fang Aili ^talk 17:46, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Der ewige jude.jpg

I contacted you because you wrote the PD rationale.

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:JCu

A tag has been placed on Template:JCu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Everything ok?

I noticed you've deleted your User page; is everything o.k.? Jayjg ^(talk) 02:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm largely retired (temporarily?) as an active contributor, and I was getting some spam from my userpage. Everything is OK, thanks for caring. :) Masterhomer 20:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Signature

Please remove the image from your signature. Images are not allowed in signatures for multiple reasons. If you'd like to use symbols, please use Unicode characters. Mr.Z-man 22:00, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion

You recently made comments about this article on its talk page. ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. JMcC (talk) 16:34, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Allegations of Israeli Apartheid?

currently there is a vote going on in removing allegations of an israeli apartheid. i would appreciate your opinion on this matter. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Allegations_of_Israeli_apartheid_%288th_nomination%29Wikifan12345 (talk) 23:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)