User talk:Masai warrior

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Duggan

Thank you for adding material from the German newspaper article. It's a good article and we may be able to use a few quotes from it. If you see anything else in Germany on that topic, it'd be great if you could add something, or draw our attention to it, as our articles currently lack the German prosecutors' point of view, which we definitely need. Many thanks again, SlimVirgin (talk) 22:59, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

It hasn't been added to that many articles: only the ones it pertains to in the LaRouche movement. Who has called it a conspiracy theory? SlimVirgin (talk) 14:59, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
What's the German that you're translating as "conspiracy theory"? SlimVirgin (talk) 15:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
I found the article. It could be conspiracy, but I'd say more likely "murder plot." If you find a reliable source who unambiguously calls it a conspiracy theory, we can certainly add it to the article. I definitely do want to see more of the other POV, but the problem with the LaRouche movement's statements is that they tend to make themselves sound even worse, so adding material from them makes the article more POV in the Duggan direction. If we could find more material from the German prosecutors or mainstream media, that would help to even things out. SlimVirgin (talk) 15:15, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Okay, if you're sure "conspiracy theory" is the best translation, I have no objection. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kronberg

See tha talk page for a discussion. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 23:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reinstating {{editprotected}}

This edit in which you reverted my decline of an edit request is inappropriate. There is clearly a dispute regarding the proposed edit, and admin shopping will not change this. Do not revert my edit again. - auburnpilot talk 14:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

Per various arbitration cases, single-purpose accounts which engage in tendentious editing and disruption with respect to LaRouche-related subjects, are to be blocked. Guy (Help!) 16:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "There have been no complaints about my behavior and no conduct warnings. For JzG to just come out of the blue and accuse me of "tendentious editing and disruption" is uncalled for. If he would like to point to a specific violation of policy on my part, fine, I'll correct it. But it appears that this is simply retaliaton for the notice I posted on WP:ANI, which was an entirely legitimate notice."

Decline reason: "On the contrary, you're clearly engaging in negative editing at Lyndon LaRouche, as seen in (to select a very small portion) [1] and [2]. Such contributions do not benefit Wikipedia, and will not be permitted. Anthøny 22:12, 2 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Note: - I've protected this talk page, as the user has requested unblocking using {{unblock}} numerous times, including the above. Anthøny 22:33, 2 November 2007 (UTC)