User:MastCell/Evidence/Slow edit-warring

March 18, inserts standalone section quoting a 1989 Washington Post article; I remove it on March 20 and explain further on the article talk page ([1])
March 22: Strider12 responds on the talk page by accusing me of disruption and "just another attempt to hide the FACT that even many (perhaps most) pro-choice experts don't agree with efforts to dismiss the real psychological significance of abortion." ([2]). I respond ([3]). Strider12 considers this sufficient to reinsert the edit ([4]).
March 23: I repeat my concerns on the talk page ([5]). Strider12 does not respond.
March 24: I remove the edit as it remains disputed and my concerns have not been addressed ([6]).
March 28: Strider12 reinserts the edit again, without intervening discussion, accusing me of "deleting her edit without consensus" ([7]). I remove it ([8]), as I consider the edit problematic and there has been no serious attempt to address my concerns on the talk page. Strider12 reverts, writing "do not DELETE material without showing consensus" ([9]). I break my self-imposed 1RR on the article and revert again, quoting WP:V ([10]). Strider12 again reinserts the edit ([11]). At this point, talkpage discussion begins again, with several editors noting that Strider12 is incorrectly applying WP:V and is repeatedly inserting controversial text without discussion ([12]).