User talk:Marvin Diode

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I'm back.

Contents

[edit] My Rfa

My effort to regain adminship was unsuccessful, and I'll do what I can to ensure your opinion of my suitability for adminship improves. Thank you for taking some time out of your day to voice your opinion.--MONGO 04:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] EIR

If EIR is accurately reporting an opinion by LaRouche, that does not discredit EIR as a source, regardless of whether LaRouche's opinion is credible or not. I asked you for examples of cases where EIR reported something as fact which turned out to be incorrect. You are applying a completely different set of standards to LaRouche publications than you do to the self-citing by King and Berlet. --Marvin Diode (talk) 03:41, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't have access to an archive of back issues of EIR or other LaRouche periodicals. Since no one is proposing using EIR as a reliable source, it seems like moot point. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 05:58, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Renewable energy

I see that you are questioning the NREL? Do you even know what they do? 199.125.109.102 (talk) 18:40, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edits

If you are the user who is making continual revisions of Anti-nuclear movement and Anti-nuclear movement in Germany, please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies before making any further edits. Your edits have been disruptive and contrary to Wikipedia policy, and could result in a block of your IP range. --Marvin Diode (talk) 21:54, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Actually you are addressing the wrong editor. CDE3 is the one who has made continual revisions to anti-nuclear movement. 199.125.109.45 (talk) 16:38, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RfC

Hi, you recently left a comment on the CAMERA talk page. I was just hoping you might respond to the post I made after yours. Thanks, --68.253.50.109 (talk) 22:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Synarchism

It looks like your page protection request on Synarchism is really a block user request. They have both violated the WP:3RR rule and are blocked accordingly. Initial period is 31 hours; if they war again, I'll up the blocking period. It looks like before this week the article was fairly stable. I'll keep an eye on it, and deal with any miscreants. —EncMstr 07:58, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps you can fix whatever needs fixing on the article now that there shouldn't be any interference? —EncMstr 08:00, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Robert Mugabe and Zimbabwe

Hi, can you tell me where the inserts I have written for the article have gone ref. political developments in 2008? Ivankinsman (talk) 14:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Synarchism protection

I have no "admitted non-neutral stance" on the dispute and haven't edited the article in months. Page protection is not an endorsement of any version. It's a blunt tool to stop editors engaged in fruitless edit warring and (hopefully) induce them to find a compromise. I suggest that you use the talk page to seek consensus. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 19:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Robert Mugabe

Hi. As a previous editor of this article your input on improvements for the article is actively sought. See Talk:Robert Mugabe. DJ Clayworth (talk) 15:12, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Did you know you were being monitored?

Your name appears to be on a list that was kept in an admin's userspace, [1]. Were you aware that an admin was keeping tabs on your editing? Cla68 (talk) 12:38, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I know SlimVirgin only by reputation; as far as I can recall, I haven't had any quarrels with her. I have tried to clean up some of the LaRouche articles which had multiple BLP problems, just as I have tried to clean up bios on other controversial figures like Robert Mugabe. Apparently getting involved with the LaRouche controversies is what got me on her list. Question: why would she repeatedly make such a list, and then admin-delete it? Couldn't she just keep the whole thing privately on her hard drive? --Marvin Diode (talk) 13:49, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
That's a good question. Cla68 (talk) 13:56, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] JzG RFAR merged with Cla68-FM-SV case

Per the arb vote here the RFAR on User:JzG is now merged with this case and he is a named party. Also see my case disposition notes there. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:30, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Chip Berlet

That one is a little problematic in that it was protected for BLP reasons and not simply because of edit warring, plus it has a long history of such protections. I would speak to the protecting admin if you want it unprotected. Hut 8.5 07:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC)