User talk:Markdsgraham
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Clifford Orwin
I nominated this article for deletion, and want to clarify that I didn't mean any offence. You're clearly new to Wikipedia; your article was very well written, but I would advise you to read the Wikipedia notability guidelines. Your article doesn't appear to satisfyWP:PROF, the Wiki policy about inclusion of academic figures. Alternatively, if you can provide adequate sources that assert the notability of Professor Orwin, then add them, and leave a comment on the deletion debate. Please don't be discouraged, and don't give up editing Wikipedia just because of this. Walton monarchist89 17:14, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- I have been working on the article; I'd say it is now perfectly good. Charles Matthews 21:04, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks everyone for the help on my first article.--Markdsgraham 21:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- I've withdrawn the AfD, as the article's now adequately sourced and provides evidence of Professor Orwin's contributions - he's more notable than I thought. Excellent first contribution. Walton monarchist89 17:24, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding your edit to Clifford Orwin:
Your recent edit to Clifford Orwin (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 21:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Harper edit
Thanks. CJCurrie 01:14, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 04:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] A question about citation
Hi, mate. I'm a doctor and a law student from Australia. I'm writing an article at the moment on the definition of death around the world, particularly as it relates to brain death. I found a couple of statutes on canlii.org and I wonder if I've cited them correctly:
Human Tissue Donation Act, R.S.P.E.I. 1988, c. H-12.1 s 1(b); Vital Statistics Act, C.C.S.M. c. V60 s 2.
Have I done this right?
In Australia, we generally don't consolidate legislation into codes. I'm a bit confused about what RSPEI and CCSM mean, and whether there's a better way to do it.
Anyway, all I'm trying to show is that in Canada, the law recognizes the concept of brain death. - Richard Cavell 02:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your recent edits
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 02:43, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
