User talk:MarkPC

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, MarkPC, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Devadasi. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Pumpmeup 05:14, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please be careful

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.   jj137 (talk) 03:56, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

I understand, and I'll keep on the lookout. But please be careful not to remove the bot generated titles; there's a reason those are there.   jj137 (talk) 20:34, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

{{confirmedsockpuppet|Saedirof}} -JodyB talk 15:03, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Independent User; Already dealing with another admin regarding multiple IP addresses pushing POV"

Decline reason: "Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Saedirof confirms that you are an abusive sockpuppet. — Yamla (talk) 03:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Hi,

I think that I have been blocked too hastily by admin User:JodyB. I was talking with admin User:Jj137 before making my edits. See my talk page above. As can be seen on my talk page, he said he was going to keep an eye on the edits made by the IP addresses which were vandalizing the page.

I have no connection with any other user or IP address. However at this time I request the admin considering my case to look at my comments at [[1]] regarding a single user coming in via multiple IP addresses. Please also check if these are the same user as user:Youonlylivetwice. In fact an admin has already raised the question why user:Youonlylivetwice is only interested in doing a check on me.

Who are the below IP addresses and what is their relationship with user:Youonlylivetwice?

Are the following edits are coming via an anonymizer website?


They all seem to be pushing the same POV on the devadasi article and reverted the article before discussing about it on the talk page. I have not received any messages on my talk page. Which IP address should I choose to leave a message? They all push the same POV and disappear forever.

I request you to kindly consider my case and observe from the history of the articles, it is clear that as soon as I make my edits, it got reverted within 15 minutes.

I request the admins to discuss and find out how it is possible so many different users with different IP addresses are watching the page and pushing the same POV without a single difference in sentence structure? Further they are interested in only one article to edit.

As the admin has said, before changing the article, editors need to discuss with the active users on this page. I am still waiting for any discussion to appear. But somebody tries to ban me by declaring me as sock puppet.

Since I believe I am on the right side, I am willing to wait patiently for appropriate action. Maybe it is a new kind of IP sock puppetry or a new anonymizing website or a group of users trying to push POV in a co-ordinated manner.

Sincerely MarkPC (talk) 00:37, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Independent users different edit histories and different areas of expertise"

Decline reason: "there is not sufficient evidence to warrant unblocking at this time— the only article you have edited is that one, and checkuser confirms you are a sockpuppet. — slakr\ talk / 03:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Hi,

In the case Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Saedirof, the {user:Saedirof} has worked on multiple articles. I am interested only in the article Devadasi. All the other users also seem to be having different interests. I can give you multiple references which clearly prove that the references given by the other editors are incorrect.

It would be helpful if you could give directions on how to clear my name.

As for me:

  • My interests, articles and reference in my edits are independent of {user:Saedirof}.
  • I am not pushing any common POV with any other user.
  • Everything I have written is backed by evidence.
  • I am discussing with admin User:Jj137 on how to deal with POV pushers from multiple IP addresses all using the same exact sentence structure.

MarkPC (talk) 22:40, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

{{unblock|Request to redo checkuser}}

Hi,

It has been known that check user has thrown false positives. Can you do a check again?

MarkPC (talk) 01:15, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

  • I'm looking into this. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 03:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
    • If I may say so, the IP address in the CU request is a university address. It may be possible that it was an error based on that. Kwsn (Ni!) 03:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
      • That IP isn't involved here. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 04:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
        • Well that clears up that issue then. Kwsn (Ni!) 07:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Previous checkuser result was a false positive.

Request handled by: jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 16:02, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Heya MarkPC, I wanted to apologize for declining your unblock request, it appears that I misunderstood what Jpgordon had said. Very sorry about that. SQLQuery me! 19:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Saedirof for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Youonlylivetwice (talk) 07:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC)