User talk:Marfotic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Marfot.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Marfot.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:06, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Marfot.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Marfot.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Iamunknown 04:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] John Stott addition

Thankyou for contributing to the article on John Stott. Your addition, though interesting, unfortunately does not meet the criteria for inclusion on wikipedia, which include the policies in WP:Verify which state:

The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. "Verifiable" in this context means that any reader should be able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source. Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed.

So if you cannot provide a reliable source for this factoid, it will unfortunately be unable to be kept in the article, per the criteria of wikipedia.

For what it's worth, I have for some time been interested in the section on annihilationism, since I had heard that he was always a lot more agnostic on annihilationism than the section makes out - but have not yet had time to look into it by getting reliable sources etc. TJ 11:08, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

If you can dig out a book or a published sermon that expands his position on annihilationism, then that may stand a chance of getting in the article. But I fear that your repeated edits may have already given a bad impression to other Wikipedia writers, who may hold your future contributions to a very high standard indeed --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 15:08, 22 October 2007 (UTC)