User talk:Marcopolis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1 Image tagging for Image:Tp3 05.jpg
2 License tagging for Image:Chgmr05.jpg
3 Unspecified source for Image:Coexhotel04.jpg
4 Unspecified source for Image:Asemtw02.jpg
5 Unspecified source for Image:Ssg03.jpg
6 Unspecified source for Image:Ssg02.jpg
7 Unspecified source for Image:Ssg01.jpg
8 Unspecified source for Image:Hyudep3.jpg
9 Unspecified source for Image:Hyudep2.jpg
10 Unspecified source for Image:Lotte0004.jpg
11 Unspecified source for Image:Lotte0003.jpg
12 Unspecified source for Image:Lotte_dep2.jpg
13 Unspecified source for Image:Lotte0002.jpg
14 Unspecified source for Image:Hyundai_dep.jpg
15 Unspecified source for Image:Lotte_dep.jpg
16 List of rapid transit systems
17 Duplicate Image:Seoulsub005.jpg
18 Please use edit summaries
19 Seoul Train Stations
20 Duplicate images uploaded
21 Copyright problems with Image:Seoulsubway.jpg
22 Image Copyright
23 Wikimedia Commons
24 Bonjour
25 Speedy deletion of Image:Hoegista07.jpg
26 Image:Seoulsub004.jpg listed for deletion
27 Images
28 Hwasong Castle image
29 Block

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Tp3 05.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tp3 05.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Chgmr05.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chgmr05.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Coexhotel04.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Coexhotel04.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 00:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Asemtw02.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Asemtw02.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Ssg03.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ssg03.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Ssg02.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ssg02.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 00:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Ssg01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ssg01.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 00:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Hyudep3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hyudep3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 00:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Hyudep2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hyudep2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 00:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Lotte0004.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lotte0004.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 00:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Lotte0003.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lotte0003.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 00:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Lotte_dep2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lotte_dep2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 00:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Lotte0002.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lotte0002.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 00:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Hyundai_dep.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hyundai_dep.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 00:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Lotte_dep.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lotte_dep.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 00:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] List of rapid transit systems

Hi! Could you at least give a explanation to why South Korea should be at the top of the List of rapid transit systems when all other countries are ordered alphabetically? -- Kildor (talk) 17:22, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate Image:Seoulsub005.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Seoulsub005.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Seoulsub005.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Seoulsub005.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please use edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

--Crossmr (talk) 04:57, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Seoul Train Stations

Please consider adding these images to the appropriate stations rather than the main article. Articles aren't meant to be galleries and this many images really adds unnecessary length to the article and doesn't really add much.--Crossmr (talk) 05:03, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:HyundaiDept07.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:HyundaiDept05.jpg. The copy called Image:HyundaiDept05.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 03:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:Seoulsubway.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Seoulsubway.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 15:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image Copyright

I don't believe you have the copyright on this image Image:Seoulines.jpg or the multitude of others you've derived from it. They are far too perfect a reproduction of the actual images. I believe they were taken from a website or perhaps scanned from a transit map/brochure. Wikipedia:Non-free content Please read this for what constitutes fair use. If you've scanned these images and combined them in to a single graphic, that doesn't make it your work. If these were even to be used in the article you'd need to include the appropriate license on the image itself.--Crossmr (talk) 21:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

(Crossmr's comment translated to Korean. 위의 Crossmr님의 내용을 한글로 번역합니다.) Marcopolis님께서 올리신 Image:Seoulines.jpg 이미지나 그로부터 만들어진 다른 이미지들에 대한 저작권을 직접 가지고 계시다고 생각하기 힘듭니다. 그림들이 원본과 비교하여 손색이 없습니다. 아마도 웹페이지나 (인쇄된) 노선도로부터 스캔하여 만들어졌다고 생각합니다. Wikipedia:Non-free content 이나 한글본인 위키백과:비자유 자료의 인용를 읽고 공정 사용에 대해서 이해해 주십시오. 단순히 스캔한 이미지들을 하나의 이미지로 합성했다고 해서 지적 소유권이 부여되지는 않습니다. 만약 이미지를 사용하고 싶으시다면 이미지에 해당하는 라이센스를 지정하여 주십시오. --Memming (talk) 22:26, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikimedia Commons

I can't speak English fluently. This is Korean. Marcopolis님은 현재 한국에 관한 많은 사진을 올려주시고 계십니다. 그 사진들을 한국어 위키백과(Korean Wikipedia)에 쓰고 싶은데, 영어 위키백과에만 등록되어 있어 현재 한국어판에서 쓸 수 없는 상황입니다. 위키미디어 공용(Wikimedia Commons)에 올려 주시면 한국어판을 비롯한 많은 Wikipedia에서 사진을 사용할 수 있습니다. 211.210.166.159 (talk) 08:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

네 알겠습니다. 시간되는데로 지금까지 올린사진들도 Wikimedia Commons으로 복사하고 새로업로드하는 사진도 그렇게 하겠습니다.

[edit] Bonjour

Comme tu as pu le voir, il y a un certain nombre de messages concernant les images que tu uploadés sur commons (Image:Linestyle.jpg ainsi que Image:Seoulines.JPG et tout leurs dérivés). Les administrateurs de wikipédia émettent des doutes concernant l'origine des ces photos. Pourrais-tu être plus précis sur leurs origines ou sur la façon dont tu les as générées ? Yves-Laurent (talk) 17:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Pour ces images, je les ai créées en utilisant illustrator et photoshop. Je ne sais pourquoi ces images causent problèmes vu que je suis celui qui les a créées et uploadées. Dois-je préciser qu'elles sont dessinées par moi même?

Cela serait, en effet, un plus de préciser leurs méthodes de création car c'est le fait qu'elles soient trop « belles » qui semble poser problème. Ainsi, pour calmer les esprits, il vaudrait mieux que tu précises si les images de bases sont de ta création ou sont des copies de plaquette officielle.

Après, je ne suis pas un expert en copyright, il y a peut être des problèmes en copyright si les images sont la copies exactes de documents officiels du métro de Seoul mais ce n'est pas ce qui semble poser problème. Bonne continuation, Yves-Laurent (talk) 07:26, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Merci pour vos conseils :D

Re-Bonjour, Je me permet de te donner encore deux ou trois autre conseils :

Afin que Wikipédia est une mise en page standard entre tout ces articles, il est généralement conseillé d'utiliser la syntaxe wiki et non la syntaxe html. Plus d'informations sont disponible ici et là. Je te donne les pages francophones car tu sembles préférer le français à l'anglais. Si tu veux lire leurs équivalent anglophone, il faudra utiliser les interwiki.
En principe, dans un article correctement formaté on ne trouve pas une seule balise HTML. Cela peut sembler étrange, pour ceux qui parlent le HTML couramment, mais cela se comprend très bien quand on sait que Wikipédia adapte sa présentation en fonction de la résolution de l'écran de l'utilisateur ce qui n'est plus possible quand l'article contient du code HTML.
D'ailleurs, afin de faciliter le dialogue avec les autres utilisateurs, il conseillé d'indiquer son niveau de maîtrise des différentes langues que l'on connaît.
L'une des grandes forces de Wikipédia est que l'on peut discuter avec les autres utilisateurs. Ainsi, quand une de tes modifications est annulée il est possible de prendre contact avec celui qui a annulé cette modification afin de savoir pourquoi il a fait cela et se mettre d'accord avec lui sur un retour partiel ou complet de cette modification. Cette discussion peut avoir lieu sur la page de discussion de l'utilisateur ou sur celle de l'article. Le tout est qu'elle ai lieux afin d'éviter que la situation s'envenime.
Enfin, une dernière pour la route, quand on effectué une modification, il est de bon ton de mettre un commentaire dans l'onglet de résumé afin que les autres personnes qui contribue a l'article sache pourquoi tu as fait cette modification. Ainsi, quand une personne annule une de tes contributions, il est fort probable qu'elle dise pourquoi en résumé.

Yves-Laurent (talk) 11:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Bien entendu, vous pouvez juste me présicer à quoi correspond l'onglet de résumé dont vous parlez dans les pages en anglais ? S'agit-il d'un des boutons en haut de page "Article / Discussion / Edit this page / History / Move / Watch" ? Bonne journée.

Oups !!!

Je contribue majoritairement sur le wiki francophone, j'en oublie que les termes ne sont pas les même d'un wiki a l'autre pour d'évidente raison de langues. Sur en cela porte le nom de "Edit summary (Briefly describe the changes you have made):". Les commentaires que l'on laisse dans cette ligne de texte sont visible dans l'historique de, l'article. Par exemple, pour l'historique de ta page de discussion, il suffit de cliquer sur "history" en haut et on arrive la dessus. Yves-Laurent (talk) 13:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Merci pour vos informations, je remarque que la syntaxe wiki est assez spécial. Je penserai à suivre ce langage pour mes futurs modifications. Au revoir.

S.v.p utilisez fr:Wikipédia:Babel pour éviter toute confusion mais utilisez la syntaxe ici Wikipedia:Babel.--Crossmr (talk) 23:04, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Hoegista07.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Hoegista07.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 08:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Seoulsub004.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Seoulsub004.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 10:35, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Images

Hi Marcopolis, it seems you're very keen on adding images to articles about Seoul. Image galleries are discouraged on Wikipedia - if I could draw your attention to Wikipedia:Writing better articles (also see the maintenance tag posted on the image gallery at Seoul), images should directly reference the text in the article. Hence, while it may seem logical to include several pictures of what can be seen in COEX (or any other entity, but this is a good example) such as Megabox, the outer courtyard etc., it may not be the right thing to do. One or two images to identify something is fine, but adding more is problematic.

When you have too many images to fit to the right of the text then you are tempted to create an "image gallery" which should be hosted elsewhere. Wikimedia Commons is a great place for such galleries, and you're probably aware about sites like Flickr. I hope this helps clear up some of the misconceptions you may have about images on WP. Anyone who takes the time and effort to upload freely licensed media is awesome, but there are still a few rules to abide by when so doing. Thanks, Deiz talk 15:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I understand, I wont make anymore photo gallery type and only put one or two images if there are a relation with the article. I just wanted to put photos on the articles to illustrate it and to give a better point of view on the subject. But I will put the images in Wikimedia commons or others sites if it is better. Thank you for your advice. I'm a student and I still have much to learn :S ... (Please understand me my english is bad.)

Hi Marcopolis. I was very surprised to see you restore the gallery on Gangnam Station, in light of my post above and your reply. Restoring such content - especially when you have asserted you understand why, and would not add it again - is considered disruptive and can lead to restrictions on your ability to edit Wikipedia. Please don't add any more image galleries, especially ones full of generic photos of subway stations, attached to short articles. I also reversed your move of Korea University Station, station articles should be capitalized. Thanks, Deiz talk 01:32, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hwasong Castle image

I believe the Hwaseong Fortress image in the infobox should be representative of the structure. The image that you posted is - although may be good does not represent the structure given the long shot, low level of details other such characteristics. Please refer to Wikipedia:Writing better articles. If you think you can have a better image than the current info box image, then please upload and replace the info box image accordingly. Otherwise, it is a good idea to leave the West gate image there. Also, after releasing/uploading the image, consider adding it to Wikipedia Commons OlkhichaAppa (talk) 02:08, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Block

Hi Marcopolis. Sorry it came to this, but given your repeated failure to act in accordance with image policy and reverts / removals of image edits you previously agreed were mistaken, I've blocked your account for 24 hours. I hope when the block expires you will be able to edit appropriately with regard to images. Please contact me if you wish to discuss this. Deiz talk 16:11, 4 March 2008 (UTC)