User:Martinphi/Links

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] General links

[edit] ArbCom

ArbCom on the Paranormal


Second ArbCom


ArbComs

[edit] Naughty naughty

[edit] ArbCom

ArbComOpenTasks

[edit] POV and COUNTERPOV

On criticism sections

Article structures that can imply a point of view

Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias

Wikipedia:Categorization of people

[edit] Rv per ArbCom on the paranormal (this section added 5 October 2007)

  • Rv per [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Paranormal|ArbCom on the paranormal]]
  • Rv per ArbCom on the paranormal [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Paranormal#Adequate_framing|Adequate framing]]
  • Rv per ArbCom on the paranormal [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Paranormal#Three_layer_cake_with_frosting|Three layer cake with frosting]]
  • Rv per ArbCom on the paranormal [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Paranormal#Paranormal_as_an_effective_tag|Paranormal as an effective tag]]
  • Rv per ArbCom on the paranormal [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Paranormal#Cultural_artifacts|Cultural artefacts]]

[edit] MSC

Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship

[edit] Tools


[edit] Sources

Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources

Secondary sources
Monograph

WP:NOR

WP:V

[edit] Good articles

[edit] Format links

[2]

[edit] Online Resources for Published Academic Articles and Scientific Papers

(do searches for "psychokinesis," "telekinesis," "conscious intention," etc.)

[edit] Templates

{{synthesis}}

{{partisan}}

{{Unbalanced section}}

<div style="float:right; margin-left:10px;">__TOC__</div>

FOR ALL YE ARTICLES WOT HATH "ISSUES."

{{Articleissues
| advert = June 2008
| blpdispute = = June 2008
| Citations missing = June 2008
| citationstyle = June 2008
| citecheck = June 2008
| cleanup = June 2008
| confusing = June 2008
| context = June 2008
| copyedit = June 2008
| criticisms = June 2008
| disputed = June 2008
| essay = June 2008
| examplefarm = June 2008
| expand = June 2008
| expert = topic name
| fiction = June 2008
| globalize = June 2008
| laundrylists = June 2008
| long = June 2008
| Nofootnote = y
| Notable = June 2008
| OR = June 2008
| orphan = June 2008
| POV = June 2008
| primarysources = June 2008
| quotefarm = June 2008
| refimprove = June 2008
| rewrite = June 2008
| sections = June 2008
| synthesis = June 2008
| technical = June 2008
| tone = June 2008
| trivia = June 2008
| unbalanced = June 2008
| unreferenced = June 2008
| weasel = June 2008
| wikify = June 2008
}}

WHEN THE TEXT IS NOT SOURCED BY THE CITATION:

{{Failed verification}}




Title Status Last checked
Anecdotal evidence 16/04/06
Coincidence Short stub. 27/01/07


...   ..   .  .
.  . .  .  .  .
...  .  .  .  .
.    .  .  .  .
.     ..    ..

Connect the dots



[edit] Links involving administrative ethics

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Removal_of_adminship

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Profg

Protection policy

Wikipedia:Wheel war

[edit] Temp

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Quantum_biology

[edit] Attack site

Old: [3]

Current version: http://www.firetreeinn.com/Paranormal/Paranormal_primer.htm

[edit] Antelan compliment

I say there "I don't think that the members of the RationalSkepticism project, taken as a whole and sometimes as individuals, are rational."

That's obvious from the template, but is not a personal attack on any person. It's a comment on the editing behavior of members of the project, and a comment on the behavior of the project as a whole. It's as if I simply said "I think you're not being rational," which is not a personal attack if backed up by data. It would be a personal attack if I said "You're not a rational person."

[4]