User:Marc Shepherd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Marc Shepherd is taking a brief break from his or her wikibreak because of a lack of willpower and/or motivation to stay away from Wikipedia.


[edit] Hail and unfarewell

After about 9 months away, I've dipped my toe back into editing. At the moment, I have no intention of watching 1,291 pages again. I would prefer to make more selective contributions.

The reasons I gave for retiring (see below) remain valid. I still feel that far too little of the content has reached even the very modest demands required for Good articles. I still feel that far too many trivial subjects become Featured articles.

And I also feel that far too much of a conscientious editor's time is spent undoing the mischief caused by good-faith mediocre editors. Wikipedia's "anyone can edit" philosophy makes mediocrity the rule, rather than the exception.

[edit] Hail and farewell

I've decided to leave the Wikipedia community. I'll shortly be emptying out my 1,291-page watch list and logging out. I'll still use Wikipedia as a reference tool, but I no longer wish to contribute. I wish to thank all the editorial colleagues I met here for their contributions and suggestions.

Part of my reason for leaving is personal. I have other projects I want to work on. Since I started contributing to Wikipedia regularly, those projects have fallen by the wayside.

I have also become somewhat dismayed with Wikipedia's limitations. I do not expect anything to change, but I would make these observations:

  • Wikipedia has excellent processes for rooting out vandals, trolls, shills, and blatantly useless edits.
  • Wikipedia has very poor processes for rooting out good-faith mediocre edits.
  • A huge proportion of the edits are, in fact, mediocre. The relatively small number of excellent editors spend a disproportionate share of their time repairing the mediocre.
  • With the time remaining after rooting out bad-faith edits and mediocre good-faith edits, even excellent editors tend to spend a disproportionate share of their time on what is fun, rather than what is useful.
  • According to Wikipedia:Good article, just 0.1% of the articles in English Wikipedia are "good articles." This appalling statistic illustrates the magnitude of the problem.
  • According to Wikipedia:Featured article, just 0.1% of the articles in English Wikipedia have been "featured articles." This would seem to be a reasonable quantity, until you consider the extremely high percentage of low-importance topics that make it to Featured status. Recent examples include Jabba the Hutt, Rush (band), and Watchmen.
  • Wikipedia's structure of barely-controlled anarchy is an excellent way to generate a ton of mediocre content, and occasionally very good content. It is not a very good way to generate an excellent encyclopedia.

Best of luck to all! Marc Shepherd 18:26, 20 September 2006 (UTC)


This is a Wikipedia user page.

This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Marc_Shepherd.