Talk:Mary Hanafin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Quality
June 2007 - Full of weasel words, and congratulatory opinions "This was one of the newly-expanded junior ministry positions created by the new government in 1997, and, although it did not hold cabinet rank, it was regarded as a hugely important position." Lookng at the history of comments, this is not a new problem. Previous attempts at removing them have not been wholly successful. If the plague persists, I would suggest putting a warnings/lock on the page. CCKKAB
[edit] Irish Language
Mary is an Irish language speaker and should be included in the new category "Category:Irish (Gaeilge) language speakers"
- What is the point of this category? It'll end up including nearly every Irish politician past and present, because they all would claim to speak Irish? Snappy56 (talk) 05:52, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed. I just noticed this new category, and (unless there is a counter argument I'm not aware of) I'll be nominating it for deletion. Categories are normally intended to group subjects by NOTABLE attribute. Cat attributes should be specific, neutral, inclusive and (above all) verifiable. Whether or how a subject get's included in this cat will be subjective, and - frankly - pointless. Problems with this cat are:
- Relevance. Compare (for example) a notional category of "Be-spectacled people". It may be factual to create such a cat, and put Sigmund Freud in it, but IT'S NOT RELEVANT that he wore glasses. Or anyone else for that matter. Unless the wearing of glasses was contributory to their notability.
- Verifiability. Exactly what standard of Irish would warrant a subject's inclusion in this article? And how do you verify it?
- Over-population. Anyone who went to school in Ireland since the late 1920s was taught Irish. Does that mean that every article who's subject fits this criteria should be included?
- Precedence. We have (for example) no category for Spanish speakers or English speakers or similar. Because it's just not appropriate. Why is Irish any different?
- Etc. Guliolopez (talk) 18:54, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with Guliolopez. Go on, take it to WP:CFD. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:53, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Nom as Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2008_May_12#Category:Irish_.28Gaeilge.29_language_speakers. Guliolopez (talk) 12:06, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with Guliolopez. Go on, take it to WP:CFD. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:53, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed. I just noticed this new category, and (unless there is a counter argument I'm not aware of) I'll be nominating it for deletion. Categories are normally intended to group subjects by NOTABLE attribute. Cat attributes should be specific, neutral, inclusive and (above all) verifiable. Whether or how a subject get's included in this cat will be subjective, and - frankly - pointless. Problems with this cat are:
Categories: Biography articles with listas parameter | Biography articles of living people | Active politicians | Politics and government work group articles | Wikipedia requested photographs of politicians and government-people | Start-Class biography (politics and government) articles | Unknown-priority biography (politics and government) articles | Wikipedia requested photographs of people | Start-Class biography articles | Ireland articles needing images | Start-Class Ireland articles | Mid-importance Ireland articles | Unassessed Politics articles