Talk:Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Low | This article has been assessed as Low-importance on the assessment scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the United States WikiProject. This project provides a central approach to United States-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
 |
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Low | This article is on a subject of Low-importance within WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. |
um....accoding to the Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, published by Columbia University Press, a lot of this is completely wrong, and the guy's name was Philip martin, not thomas
- The actual text of the opinion states that Martin was Lord Fairfax's "nephew named Thomas Bryan Martin." Any other supposed errors? Postdlf 20:30, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- well actually the text of the opinion says that Thomas was the name of the defendant's uncle, i.e. the man who originally owned the land, Denny is the name of the defendant. Other than that it is a useful article, thanks.
