Talk:Martin the Warrior
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move. -- Kjkolb 09:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Martin the Warrior (book) → Martin the Warrior … Rationale: Martin the Warrior is a book in the Redwall series. Martin the Warrior is also a fictional character in the book of the same name. Currently, Martin the Warrior is a disambiguation page between the two terms, but per Wikipedia naming conventions, I think that Martin the Warrior (book) should be moved to Martin the Warrior, with a disambiguation link at the top of the new article informing readers of Martin the Warrior (fictional character). … Please share your opinion at Talk:Martin the Warrior (book). —Runch 19:29, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Support slightly better naming perhaps. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:14, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Note: Page Move
Martin the Warrior (fictional character) was moved to Martin the Warrior (Redwall) for consistency with the other character pages on Wikipedia. - Runch 16:15, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Chronological Order
Has anyone considered how to handle the frame story of Martin the Warrior in the chronological list of Redwall books? The frame story is set right after Mariel of Redwall, but the main story is set, as listed, after Lord Brocktree. I do not necessarily think the order should be changed, but I think there needs to be some mention in the article, if not in the table, that there are two time periods covered in the book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.71.192.6 (talk) 00:28, 11 November 2007 (UTC)