Talk:Martin Chavez

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

Contents 1 unfair bias 2 Agreed 3 Removed {{POV}} 4 Please add ABQPAC info

[edit] unfair bias

I think the last paragraph of the Martin Chavez article has unfair bias against Martin Chavez. I believe it is not fair, and does not fit in with Wikipedia standards for content. More over, I think this article violates the official policy NPOV.

Also the last paragraph has incorrect facts. Sources should have been used to backup facts.

Claystorm 03:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC) Claystorm

[edit] Agreed

I agree. A statement like "often supporting positions that aid downtown businesses and housing developers" is politically charged because these phrases are often used to imply that this behavior is done at the expense of the "small taxpayer" or other groups.

Also only one side of the road through Petroglyph is presented, which is the side opposed to it. There's no presentation of the benefits of the road, why Martin Chavez wanted it, etc.

So I would agree that the second paragraph is lacking in neutrality.

M

[edit] Removed {{POV}}

I went ahead and removed the {{POV}}, (taging the page as a page with a neutrality problem) as the page now has a neutral POV.

Claystorm 22:10, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please add ABQPAC info

This seems to be important to Chavez's career. Please add something about it if you know it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.35.126.6 (talk) 06:46, 31 December 2007 (UTC)